Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 14;9(6):e029690.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029690.

Understanding public opinion to the introduction of minimum unit pricing in Scotland: a qualitative study using Twitter

Affiliations

Understanding public opinion to the introduction of minimum unit pricing in Scotland: a qualitative study using Twitter

Laurence Astill Wright et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: On 1 May 2018 minimum unit pricing (MUP) of alcohol was introduced in Scotland. This study used Twitter posts to quantify sentiment expressed online during the introduction of MUP, conducted a thematic analysis of these perceptions and analysed which Twitter users were associated with which particular sentiments.

Design and setting: This qualitative social media analysis captured all tweets relating to MUP during the 2 weeks after the introduction of the policy. These tweets were assessed using a mixture of human and machine coding for relevance, sentiment and source. A thematic analysis was conducted.

Participants: 74 639 tweets were collected over 14 days. Of these 53 574 were relevant to MUP.

Results: Study findings demonstrate that opinion on the introduction of MUP in Scotland was somewhat divided, as far as is discernible on Twitter, with a slightly higher proportion of positive posts (35%) than negative posts (28%), with positive sentiment stronger in Scotland itself. Furthermore, 55% of positive tweets/retweets were originally made by health or alcohol policy-related individuals or organisations. Thematic analysis of tweets showed some evidence of misunderstanding around policy issues.

Conclusions: It is possible to appreciate the divided nature of public opinion on the introduction of MUP in Scotland using Twitter, the nature of the sentiment around it and the key actors involved. It will be possible to later study how this changes when the policy becomes more established.

Keywords: alcohol; internet; pubic policy; public opinion; scotland; social media.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Babor T, Caetano R. Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity. 2nd edn New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
    1. Monteiro MG. The road to a world health organization global strategy for reducing the harmful use of alcohol. Alcohol Res Health 2011;34:257–60. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Global Strategy to Reduce Harmful Use of Alcohol. 2010. http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/activities/gsrhua/en/ (Accessed 16 Aug 2018).
    1. Sharma A, Sinha K, Vandenberg B. Pricing as a means of controlling alcohol consumption. Br Med Bull 2017;123:149–58. 10.1093/bmb/ldx020 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Angus C, Holmes J, Pryce R, et al. . Model-based appraisal of the comparative impact of Minimum Unit Pricing and taxation policies in Scotland. An adaptation of the Sheffield Alcohol Policy Model version 3. 2016. https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.565373!/file/Scotland_report_2... (Accessed 06 May 2018).

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources