Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Aug:185:107698.
doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2019.107698. Epub 2019 Jun 12.

Validation of the Icare® TONOVET plus rebound tonometer in normal rabbit eyes

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Validation of the Icare® TONOVET plus rebound tonometer in normal rabbit eyes

Shawna Gloe et al. Exp Eye Res. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

To determine the accuracy and precision of the Icare® TONOVET Plus rebound tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) in normal rabbit eyes, as well as compare it to three other commercially available tonometers: the Icare® TONOVET (TV01), Tono-Pen Vet™, and Tono-Pen AVIA Vet™. The anterior chambers of both eyes of three New Zealand White rabbits were cannulated, post-mortem. IOP was measured using each of the above four tonometers at manometric pressures ranging between 5 mmHg and 70 mmHg. Data were analyzed by linear regression, ANOVA, and Bland-Altman plots. A p-value of ≤0.05 was considered significant for all statistical tests. IOP values obtained with the TONOVET Plus (in 'lapine' mode) were significantly closer to manometric IOP than those obtained with the other tonometers tested. The TV01 (in 'd' dog setting) and Tono-Pen AVIA Vet™ were significantly more accurate compared to the Tono-Pen Vet™. All tonometers had high levels of precision, though the TONOVET Plus and TV01 were significantly more precise compared to the Tono-Pen AVIA Vet™. All tonometers tended to underestimate IOP, particularly at high pressures, however the TONOVET Plus was highly correlated with manometric IOP in the clinically relevant range of 5-50 mmHg. The TONOVET Plus is an appropriate choice of instrument for measuring IOP in rabbit eyes in both research and clinical settings.

Keywords: Glaucoma; Intraocular pressure; Rabbit; Rebound tonometer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
IOP measured with the Icare® TONOVET Plus, TONOVET®, Tono-Pen Vet™, and Tono-Pen AVIA™ all showed strong linear correlations with manometric IOP. (A) IOP values taken with the Icare® Tonovet Plus were significantly more accurate than those taken with the (B) TONOVET (p<0.001), (C) Tonopen-Vet (p<0.001) and (D) Tonopen AVIA-Vet (p<0.02). Linear regression lines are shown as dashed and y=x lines shown as solid for reference. Some data points are super-imposed.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
All tonometers tended to underestimate IOP, particularly as manometric pressure increased. (A) Measurements taken with the Icare® TONOVET Plus, most closely agreed with manometric IOP, especially in the clinically relevant range of 5 – 50 mmHg, whereas the (B) TONOVET, (C) Tono-Pen Vet™, and (D) Tono-Pen AVIA™ all began underestimating IOP between 5 and 15 mmHg. Upper and lower red dotted lines indicate 95% Limits of Agreement. Some data points are super-imposed.

References

    1. Chui WS, Lam A, Chen D, Chiu R. The influence of corneal properties on rebound tonometry. Ophthalmol. 2008: 115; 80–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.Q61 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Elsmo EJ, Kiland JA, Kaufman PL, McLellan GJ. Evaluation of rebound tonometry in non-human primates. Exp Eye Res 2011; 92: 268–273. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2011.01.013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Iliev MA, Goldblum D, Katsoulis K, Amstutz C, Frueh B. Comparison of rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry and correlation with central corneal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90: 833–835. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2005.089870 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Görig C, Coenen RTI, Stades FC, Djajadiningrat-Laanen SC, Boeve MH. Comparison of the use of new handheld tonometers and established applanation tonometers in dogs. AJVR 2006; 67: 134–144. DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.67.1.134 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kalesnykas G, Uusitalo H. Comparison of simultaneous readings of intraocular pressure in rabbits using Perkins handheld, Tono-Pen XL, and TonoVet tonometers. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007; 245: 761–762. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-006-0470-8 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types