Factors supporting and constraining the implementation of robot-assisted surgery: a realist interview study
- PMID: 31203248
- PMCID: PMC6589012
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028635
Factors supporting and constraining the implementation of robot-assisted surgery: a realist interview study
Abstract
Objective: To capture stakeholders' theories concerning how and in what contexts robot-assisted surgery becomes integrated into routine practice.
Design: A literature review provided tentative theories that were revised through a realist interview study. Literature-based theories were presented to the interviewees, who were asked to describe to what extent and in what ways those theories reflected their experience. Analysis focused on identifying mechanisms through which robot-assisted surgery becomes integrated into practice and contexts in which those mechanisms are triggered.
Setting: Nine hospitals in England where robot-assisted surgery is used for colorectal operations.
Participants: Forty-four theatre staff with experience of robot-assisted colorectal surgery, including surgeons, surgical trainees, theatre nurses, operating department practitioners and anaesthetists.
Results: Interviewees emphasised the importance of support from hospital management, team leaders and surgical colleagues. Training together as a team was seen as beneficial, increasing trust in each other's knowledge and supporting team bonding, in turn leading to improved teamwork. When first introducing robot-assisted surgery, it is beneficial to have a handpicked dedicated robotic team who are able to quickly gain experience and confidence. A suitably sized operating theatre can reduce operation duration and the risk of de-sterilisation. Motivation among team members to persist with robot-assisted surgery can be achieved without involvement in the initial decision to purchase a robot, but training that enables team members to feel confident as they take on the new tasks is essential.
Conclusions: We captured accounts of how robot-assisted surgery has been introduced into a range of hospitals. Using a realist approach, we were also able to capture perceptions of the factors that support and constrain the integration of robot-assisted surgery into routine practice. We have translated these into recommendations that can inform future implementations of robot-assisted surgery.
Keywords: implementation; realist evaluation; robot-assisted surgery; robotic surgery.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Perceptions of theatre team members to robotic assisted surgery and the aid of technology in colorectal surgery.J Robot Surg. 2024 May 4;18(1):198. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01923-9. J Robot Surg. 2024. PMID: 38703230
-
A realist process evaluation of robot-assisted surgery: integration into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration and decision-making.Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2017 Jun. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2017 Jun. PMID: 28813131 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
How do team experience and relationships shape new divisions of labour in robot-assisted surgery? A realist investigation.Health (London). 2021 Mar;25(2):250-268. doi: 10.1177/1363459319874115. Epub 2019 Sep 14. Health (London). 2021. PMID: 31522572
-
Integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: a realist process evaluation protocol.Implement Sci. 2014 May 2;9:52. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-52. Implement Sci. 2014. PMID: 24885669 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Practices of falls risk assessment and prevention in acute hospital settings: a realist investigation.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Mar;12(5):1-194. doi: 10.3310/JWQC5771. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024. PMID: 38511977 Review.
Cited by
-
Robots for surgeons? Surgeons for robots? Exploring the acceptance of robotic surgery in the light of attitudes and trust in robots.BMC Psychol. 2024 Jan 24;12(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01529-8. BMC Psychol. 2024. PMID: 38267998 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic Surgery from a Gynaecological Oncology Perspective: A Global Gynaecological Oncology Surgical Outcomes Collaborative Led Study (GO SOAR3).Diseases. 2025 Jan 6;13(1):9. doi: 10.3390/diseases13010009. Diseases. 2025. PMID: 39851473 Free PMC article.
-
Experiences of perioperative nurses with robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review of qualitative studies.J Robot Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):785-795. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01511-9. Epub 2022 Dec 21. J Robot Surg. 2023. PMID: 36542241
-
Human-robot collaboration in surgery at the nexus of knowledge, agency, and ownership.Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23642. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08437-w. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40604196 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptions of theatre team members to robotic assisted surgery and the aid of technology in colorectal surgery.J Robot Surg. 2024 May 4;18(1):198. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01923-9. J Robot Surg. 2024. PMID: 38703230
References
-
- Smith A, Smith J, Jayne DG. Telerobotics: surgery for the 21st century. Surgery 2006;24:74–8. 10.1383/surg.2006.24.2.74 - DOI
-
- LAPCO National Training Programme for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. Secondary. www.lapco.nhs.uk - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources