Early versus delayed umbilical cord clamping on maternal and neonatal outcomes
- PMID: 31203386
- PMCID: PMC6694086
- DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05215-8
Early versus delayed umbilical cord clamping on maternal and neonatal outcomes
Abstract
Purpose: Policies for timing of cord clamping varied from early cord clamping (ECC) in the first 30 s after birth, to delayed cord clamping (DCC) in more than 30 s after birth or when cord pulsation has ceased. DCC, an inexpensive method allowed physiological placental transfusion. The aim of this article is to review the benefits and the potential harms of early versus delayed cord clamping.
Methods: Narrative overview, synthesizing the findings of the literature retrieved from searches of computerized databases.
Results: Delayed cord clamping in term and preterm infants had shown higher hemoglobin levels and iron storage, the improved infants' and children's neurodevelopment, the lesser anemia, the higher blood pressure and the fewer transfusions, as well as the lower rates of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), chronic lung disease, necrotizing enterocolitis, and late-onset sepsis. DCC was seldom associated with lower Apgar scores, neonatal hypothermia of admission, respiratory distress, and severe jaundice. In addition, DCC was not associated with increased risk of postpartum hemorrhage and maternal blood transfusion whether in cesarean section or vaginal delivery. DCC appeared to have no effect on cord blood gas analysis. However, DCC for more than 60 s reduced drastically the chances of obtaining clinically useful cord blood units (CBUs).
Conclusion: Delayed cord clamping in term and preterm infants was a simple, safe, and effective delivery procedure, which should be recommended, but the optimal cord clamping time remained controversial.
Keywords: Delayed cord clamping; Early cord clamping; Maternal outcomes; Prenatal outcomes.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
Comment in
-
Letter to the Editor: Early versus delayed umbilical cord clamping on maternal and neonatal outcomes.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Dec;302(6):1547-1548. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05293-8. Epub 2019 Nov 2. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020. PMID: 31679037 No abstract available.
References
-
- Committee on Obstetric Practice ACoO, Gynecologists Committee Opinion No. 543: timing of umbilical cord clamping after birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(6):1522–1526. - PubMed
-
- Fogarty M, Osborn DA, Askie L, Seidler AL, Hunter K, Lui K, Simes J, Tarnow-Mordi W. Delayed vs early umbilical cord clamping for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(1):1–18. - PubMed
-
- Chapman J, Marfurt S, Reid J. Effectiveness of delayed cord clamping in reducing postdelivery complications in preterm infants: a systematic review. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2016;30(4):372–378. - PubMed
-
- Jaleel R, Deeba F, Khan A. Timing of umbilical cord clamping and neonatal haematological status. J Pak Med Assoc. 2009;59(7):468–470. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
