Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty: From whence we came and where we are going
- PMID: 31205593
- PMCID: PMC6556490
- DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i5.322
Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty: From whence we came and where we are going
Abstract
The most effective and durable treatment for obesity is bariatric surgery. However, less than 2% of eligible patients who fulfill the criteria for bariatric surgery undergo the procedure. As a result, there is a drive to develop less invasive therapies to combat obesity. Endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBT) for weight loss are important since they are more effective than pharmacological treatments and lifestyle changes and present lower adverse event rates compared to bariatric surgery. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is a minimally invasive EBT that involves remodeling of the greater curvature. ESG demonstrated favorable outcomes in several centers, with up to 20.9% total body weight loss and 60.4% excess weight loss (EWL) on 2-year follow-up, with a low rate of severe adverse events (SAE). As such, it could be considered safe and effective in light of ASGE/ASMBS thresholds of > 25% EWL and ≤ 5% SAE, although there are no comparative trials to support this. Additionally, ESG showed improvement in diabetes mellitus type 2, hypertension, and other obesity-related comorbidities. As this procedure continues to develop there are several areas that can be addressed to improve outcomes, including device improvements, technique standardization, patient selection, personalized medicine, combination therapies, and training standardization. In this editorial we discuss the origins of the ESG, current data, and future developments.
Keywords: Bariatric; Comorbidities; Editorial; Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty; Endoscopy; Gastroplasty; Obesity; Overweight; Sleeve; Surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest statement: de Moura EGH consultant for Boston Scientific and Olympus, de Moura EGH is a consultant to Boston Scientific. Thompson CC reports fee as a consultant for Boston Scientific and Medtronic; fees as consultant and institutional grants from USGE Medical, Olympus, and Apollo Endosurgery. All other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
-
- World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight. 2018. Available from: http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight.
-
- Ruiz-Cota P, Bacardí-Gascón M, Jiménez-Cruz A. Long-term outcomes of metabolic and bariatric surgery in adolescents with severe obesity with a follow-up of at least 5 years: A systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15:133–144. - PubMed
-
- Khosravi-Largani M, Nojomi M, Aghili R, Otaghvar HA, Tanha K, Seyedi SHS, Mottaghi A. Evaluation of all Types of Metabolic Bariatric Surgery and its Consequences: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obes Surg. 2019;29:651–690. - PubMed
-
- Barrichello S, Minata MK, García Ruiz de Gordejuela A, Bernardo WM, de Souza TF, Galvão Neto M, Hourneaux de Moura DT, Santo MA, Hourneaux de Moura EG. Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Treatments for Obesity: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Short- and Mid-Term Results. Obes Surg. 2018;28:3199–3212. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
