Determinants and underlying causes of frequent attendance in midwife-led care: an exploratory cross-sectional study
- PMID: 31208355
- PMCID: PMC6580473
- DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2316-5
Determinants and underlying causes of frequent attendance in midwife-led care: an exploratory cross-sectional study
Abstract
Background: An adequate number of prenatal consultations is beneficial to the health of the mother and fetus. Guidelines recommend an average of 5-14 consultations. Daily practice, however, shows that some women attend the midwifery practice more frequently. This study examined factors associated with frequent attendance in midwifery-led care.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in a large midwifery practice in the Netherlands among low-risk women who started prenatal care in 2015 and 2016. Based on Andersen's behavioral model, we collected data on potential determinants from the digital midwifery's practice database. Prenatal healthcare utilization was measured by a revised version of the Kotelchuck Index, which measures a combination of care entry and numbers of visits. Logistic regression models were fitted to estimate the likelihood of frequent attendance compared to the recommended number of visits, adjusted for all relevant factors. Separate models were fitted on the non-referred and the referred group of obstetric-led care, as referral was found to be an effect modifier.
Results: The prevalence of frequent attendance was 23% (243/1053), mainly caused by worries and/or vague complaints (44%; 106/243). Among non-referred women, 53% (560/1053), frequent attendance was associated with consultation with an obstetrician (OR = 3.99 (2.35-6.77)) and exposure to sexual violence (OR = 2.17 (1.11-4.24)). Among the referred participants, 47% (493/1053), frequent attendance was associated with a consultation with an obstetrician (OR = 2.75 (1.66-4.57)), psychosocial problems in the past or present (OR = 1.85 (1.02-3.35) or OR = 2.99 (1.43-6.25)), overweight (OR = 1.88 (1.09-3.24)), and deprived area (OR = 0.50 (0.27-0.92)).
Conclusion: Our exploratory study indicates that the determinants of frequent attendance in midwifery-led care differs between non-referred and referred women. Underlying causes for frequent attendance was mainly because of non-medical reasons.
Implication for practice: A trustful midwife-client relationship is known to be needed for clients such as frequent attenders to share more detailed, personal stories in case of vague complaints or worries, which is necessary to identify their implicit needs.
Keywords: Midwifery; Patient acceptance of health care; Prenatal care; Psychosocial deprivation; Sexual violence; Social determinants of health.
Conflict of interest statement
The work of Dr. Janneke Gitsels-van der Wal was funded by KNOV Fellowship 2017. The work of the other authors was not funded and they have nothing to disclose.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Maternal characteristics associated with referral to obstetrician-led care in low-risk pregnant women in the Netherlands: A retrospective cohort study.PLoS One. 2023 Mar 15;18(3):e0282883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282883. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 36921011 Free PMC article.
-
Perinatal outcomes of frequent attendance in midwifery care in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 May 6;20(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02957-1. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020. PMID: 32375734 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of prenatal health care utilisation by low-risk women: a prospective cohort study.Women Birth. 2015 Jun;28(2):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Feb 11. Women Birth. 2015. PMID: 25682444
-
Psychosocial factors associated with early initiation and frequency of antenatal care (ANC) visits in a rural and urban setting in South Africa: a cross-sectional survey.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jan 25;16:18. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0807-1. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016. PMID: 26810320 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of Frequent Attendance in Primary Care. A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies.Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Feb 9;8:595674. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.595674. eCollection 2021. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021. PMID: 33634146 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Maternal characteristics associated with referral to obstetrician-led care in low-risk pregnant women in the Netherlands: A retrospective cohort study.PLoS One. 2023 Mar 15;18(3):e0282883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282883. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 36921011 Free PMC article.
-
Perinatal outcomes of frequent attendance in midwifery care in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 May 6;20(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02957-1. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020. PMID: 32375734 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organisation - recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. 2016. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/250796/9789241549912-eng.... Accessed 23 Apr 2019. - PubMed
-
- NICE National Institute for Health and Care Excellence - guideline Antenatal care for uncomplicated pregnancies: schedule of appointments. Available from: https://pathways.nice.org.uk/pathways/antenatal-care-for-uncomplicated-p.... Accessed 23 Apr 2019. - PubMed
-
- Feijen-de Jong E, Jansen DWMC, Baarveld F, Boerleider A, Spelten E, Schellevis F, Reijneveld SA. Determinants of prenatal healthcare utilization by low-risk women in primary midwifery-led care in the Netherlands: a prospective cohort study. Women Birth. 2015;28(2):87. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.01.005. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ministry of Health . Demographic and Health Survey of Indonesia. 2012.
-
- De Boer, J., Zeeman, K. Prenatale verloskundige begeleiding. Aanbevelingen voor ondersteuning, interactie en voorlichting. KNOV-standaard Wetenschappelijke onderbouwing, 2008 Utrecht. In Dutch. Available from: https://www.knov.nl/serve/file/knov.nl/knov_downloads/985/file/Wetenscha.... Accessed 17 May 2019.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous