Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 17;19(1):392.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4135-9.

Effectiveness of Medicare cost-sharing elimination for Cancer screening on utilization

Affiliations

Effectiveness of Medicare cost-sharing elimination for Cancer screening on utilization

Wendy Yi Xu et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) eliminated the cost-sharing requirement for several preventive cancer screenings. This study examined the cancer screening utilization of mammogram, Pap smear and colonoscopy in Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) under the ACA.

Methods: The primary data were the 2007-2013 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey linked to FFS claims. The effect of the cost-sharing removal on the probability of receiving a preventive cancer screening test was estimated using a logistic regression, separately for each screening test, adjusting for the complex survey design. The model was also separately estimated for different socioeconomic and race/ethnic groups. The study sample included beneficiaries with Part B coverage for the entire calendar year, excluding beneficiaries in Medicaid or Medicare Advantage plans. Beneficiaries with a claims-documented or self-reported history of targeted cancers, who were likely to have diagnostic tests or have surveillance screenings were excluded. The screening measures were constructed separately following Medicare coverage and U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations. We measured the screening utilization outcome drawing from claims data, as well as using the self-reported survey data.

Results: After the cost-sharing removal policy, we found no statistically significant difference in a beneficiary's probability of receiving a colonoscopy (transition period: OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.90-1.29; post-policy period: OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.83-1.42), a mammogram (transition period: OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.91-1.17; post-policy period: OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.88-1.30), or a biennial Pap smear (transition period: OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.69-1.09; post-policy period: OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.51-1.03) in claims-based measures following Medicare coverage. Similarly, we found null effects of the policy change on utilization of colonoscopy among enrollees 50-75 years old, biennial mammograms by women 50-74, and triennial Pap smear tests among women 21-65 in claims-based measures according to USPSTF. The findings from survey-based measures were consistent with the estimates from claims-based measures, except that the use of Pap smear declined since 2011. Further, the policy change did not increase utilization in patients with disadvantaged socioeconomic characteristics. Yet the disparate patterns in adjusted screening rates by socioeconomic status and race/ethnicity persisted over time.

Conclusions: Removing out-of-pocket costs for screenings did not provide enough incentives to increase the screening rates among Medicare beneficiaries.

Keywords: Affordable care act; Cost-sharing elimination; Medicare; Preventive screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors do not have conflicts of interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Adjusted Screening Rates by Education. a Mammogram, b Pap Test, c Colonoscopy
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Adjusted Screening Rates by Race/Ethnicity. a Mammogram, b Pap Test, c Colonoscopy
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Adjusted Screening Rates by Income. a Mammogram, b Pap Test, c Colonoscopy

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Heron M. Deaths: leading causes for 2016. National Vital Statistics Reports. 2018;67(6). - PubMed
    1. Hall IJ, Tangka FK, Sabatino SA, Thompson TD, Graubard BI, Breen N. Patterns and trends in Cancer screening in the United States. Prev Chronic Dis. 2018;15:170465. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.170465. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cherkin DC, Grothaus L, Wagner EH. The effect of office visit copayments on preventive care services in an HMO. Inquiry. 1989;27(1):24–38. - PubMed
    1. Lohr KN, Brook RH, Kamberg CJ, et al. Use of medical care in the Rand health insurance experiment: diagnosis- and service-specific analyses in a randomized controlled trial. Med Care. 1986, 24(9):S31–8. - PubMed
    1. Remler DK, Greene J. Cost-sharing: a blunt instrument. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:293–311. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090804. - DOI - PubMed