Factors influencing decisions by critical care physicians to withdraw life-sustaining treatments in critically ill adult patients with severe traumatic brain injury
- PMID: 31209132
- PMCID: PMC6581526
- DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.190154
Factors influencing decisions by critical care physicians to withdraw life-sustaining treatments in critically ill adult patients with severe traumatic brain injury
Abstract
Background: Most deaths in critically ill patients with severe traumatic brain injury are associated with a decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatments. We aimed to identify the behavioural determinants that influence recommendations by critical care physicians to consider the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments in this population.
Methods: We conducted a descriptive qualitative study based on the Theoretical Domains Framework of critical care physicians caring for patients with severe traumatic brain injury across Canada. We stratified critical care physicians by regions and used a purposive sampling strategy. We conducted semistructured phone interviews using a piloted and pretested interview guide. We transcribed the interviews verbatim and verified the content for accuracy. We performed the analysis using a 3-step approach: coding, generation of specific beliefs and generation of specific themes.
Results: We recruited 20 critical care physicians across 4 geographic regions. After reaching saturation, we identified 7 core themes across 4 Theoretical Domains Framework domains for factors relevant to the decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatments. Four factors (i.e., clinical triggers, social triggers, interaction with families and intentions with medical decisions) were identified before the decision is made and 3 were identified during the decision-making process (i.e., considerations, priorities and knowledge needs). We identified multiple themes reflecting internal (n = 18, 8 Theoretical Domains Framework domains) and external (n = 15, 6 Theoretical Domains Framework domains) influences on the decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatments.
Interpretation: We identified several core themes and domains considered by critical care physicians in Canada in the decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatments in critically ill patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Future research should aim at identifying the factors influencing surrogate decision-makers in the decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatments in these patients.
© 2019 Joule Inc. or its licensors or its licensors.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Neurocritical care physicians' doubt about whether to withdraw life-sustaining treatment the first days after devastating brain injury: an interview study.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Aug 28;27(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0648-9. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019. PMID: 31462245 Free PMC article.
-
Decision-Making on Withholding or Withdrawing Life Support in the ICU: A Worldwide Perspective.Chest. 2017 Aug;152(2):321-329. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.04.176. Epub 2017 May 5. Chest. 2017. PMID: 28483610
-
Factors influencing communication and decision-making about life-sustaining technology during serious illness: a qualitative study.BMJ Open. 2016 May 23;6(5):e010451. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010451. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 27217281 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence and impact of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies in clinical trials of severe traumatic brain injury: A systematic review.Clin Trials. 2018 Aug;15(4):398-412. doi: 10.1177/1740774518771233. Epub 2018 Jun 4. Clin Trials. 2018. PMID: 29865897
-
Physician decision-making process about withholding/withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in paediatric patients: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Jun 24;21(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01003-5. BMC Palliat Care. 2022. PMID: 35751075 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Ethics and the 2018 Practice Guideline on Disorders of Consciousness: A Framework for Responsible Implementation.Neurology. 2022 Apr 26;98(17):712-718. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200301. Epub 2022 Mar 11. Neurology. 2022. PMID: 35277446 Free PMC article.
-
Estimating bias from withdrawal of life sustaining treatment in clinical trials.Crit Care. 2025 Jul 8;29(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05538-w. Crit Care. 2025. PMID: 40629451 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Proceedings of the First Curing Coma Campaign NIH Symposium: Challenging the Future of Research for Coma and Disorders of Consciousness.Neurocrit Care. 2021 Jul;35(Suppl 1):4-23. doi: 10.1007/s12028-021-01260-x. Epub 2021 Jul 8. Neurocrit Care. 2021. PMID: 34236619 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic Research in Traumatic Brain Injury: Markers, Modeling, and Methodological Principles.J Neurotrauma. 2021 Sep 15;38(18):2502-2513. doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6708. Epub 2020 May 20. J Neurotrauma. 2021. PMID: 32316847 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Early discrimination of cognitive motor dissociation from disorders of consciousness: pitfalls and clues.J Neurol. 2021 Jan;268(1):178-188. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10125-w. Epub 2020 Aug 4. J Neurol. 2021. PMID: 32754829 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Carney N, Totten AM, O’Reilly C, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury, fourth edition. Neurosurgery 2017;80:6–15. - PubMed
-
- Chesnut RM, Ghajar J, Maas AIR, et al. Early indicators of prognosis in severe traumatic brain injury. In: Management and prognosis of severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Trauma Foundation; 2000:153–255.
-
- Wärme PE, Bergström R, Persson L. Neurosurgical intensive care improves outcome after severe head injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1991;110:57–64. - PubMed
-
- Turgeon AF, Lauzier F, Burns KE, et al. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Determination of neurologic prognosis and clinical decision making in adult patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a survey of Canadian intensivists, neurosurgeons, and neurologists. Crit Care Med 2013;41:1086–93. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical