Subjective responses to amphetamine in young adults with previous mood elevation experiences
- PMID: 31209507
- PMCID: PMC7053220
- DOI: 10.1007/s00213-019-05295-z
Subjective responses to amphetamine in young adults with previous mood elevation experiences
Abstract
Rationale: One risk factor for alcohol and substance misuse is hypomanic experiences, or periods of mood elevation. Young people who report hypomanic states are more likely to develop bipolar disorder (BP), and BP and other mood disorders increase the risk of addiction. We recently reported that young adults with a history of mood elevation experience less subjective effects from a low dose of alcohol, which may be predictive of future alcohol use. The finding with alcohol raised the question of whether this dampened response to a drug also applies to other drugs, such as amphetamine.
Objective: This study assessed responses of d-amphetamine in healthy young adults with varying experiences of mood elevation, as measured by the Mood Disorders Questionnaire (MDQ).
Methods: Healthy 18-19-year-olds (N = 30) with a range of MDQ scores participated in three 4-h laboratory sessions in which they received placebo, 10 mg, or 20 mg d-amphetamine. They completed mood questionnaires and cardiovascular measures.
Results: Individuals with higher MDQ scores reported less stimulation and euphoria after 10 mg, but not 20 mg, d-amphetamine, than individuals with lower scores. MDQ scores were not related to cardiovascular responses to the drug.
Conclusions: A history of mood elevation experiences or hypomania states is related to dampened response to a low dose of a psychostimulant drug, extending previous findings with dampened response to alcohol. This phenotype for mood disorders of dampened responses to drugs may contribute to risk for subsequent drug use or misuse.
Keywords: Amphetamine; Bipolar disorder; Hypomania; Subjective effects.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Effects of amphetamine on reactivity to emotional stimuli.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Mar;220(1):143-53. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2498-7. Epub 2011 Sep 24. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012. PMID: 21947316 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Personality and the acute subjective effects of d-amphetamine in humans.J Psychopharmacol. 2013 Mar;27(3):256-64. doi: 10.1177/0269881112472564. Epub 2013 Jan 23. J Psychopharmacol. 2013. PMID: 23343596 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Subjective responses predict d-amphetamine choice in healthy volunteers.Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2021 May;204:173158. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2021.173158. Epub 2021 Mar 4. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2021. PMID: 33675838 Free PMC article.
-
The efficacy and safety profile of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, a prodrug of d-amphetamine, for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adults.Clin Ther. 2009 Jan;31(1):142-76. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.01.015. Clin Ther. 2009. PMID: 19243715 Review.
-
Cross validation with the mood disorder questionnaire (MDQ) of an instrument for the detection of hypomania in Brazil: The 32 item hypomania symptom check-list, first Revision (HCI-32-R1).J Affect Disord. 2012 Nov;140(3):215-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.12.033. Epub 2012 Jan 28. J Affect Disord. 2012. PMID: 22284020 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of amphetamines on blood pressure.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 28;3(3):CD007896. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007896.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 40152309
-
Rewarding Subjective Effects of the NMDAR Antagonist Nitrous Oxide (Laughing Gas) Are Moderated by Impulsivity and Depressive Symptoms in Healthy Volunteers.Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021 Jul 23;24(7):551-561. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyab009. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021. PMID: 33667308 Free PMC article.
-
Association between psychosis and substance use in Kenya. Findings from the NeuroGAP-Psychosis study.Front Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 29;15:1301976. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1301976. eCollection 2024. Front Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38501084 Free PMC article.
-
AMPed-up adolescents: The role of age in the abuse of amphetamines and its consequences on cognition and prefrontal cortex development.Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2020 Nov;198:173016. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2020.173016. Epub 2020 Aug 20. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2020. PMID: 32828971 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of childhood adversity on acute subjective effects of stimulant and opioid drugs: Evidence from placebo-controlled studies in healthy volunteers.J Psychopharmacol. 2024 Nov;38(11):986-997. doi: 10.1177/02698811241268892. Epub 2024 Aug 8. J Psychopharmacol. 2024. PMID: 39118370 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Abi-Dargham A, Kegeles LS, Martinez D, Innis RB, Laruelle M (2003) Dopamine mediation of positive reinforcing effects of amphetamine in stimulant naive healthy volunteers: results from a large cohort. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 13:459–468 - PubMed
-
- American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub
-
- Anand A, Verhoeff P, Seneca N, Zoghbi SS, Seibyl JP, Charney DS, Innis RB (2000) Brain SPECT imaging of amphetamine-induced dopamine release in euthymic bipolar disorder patients. Am J Psychiatry 157:1108–1114 - PubMed
-
- Bergsholm P, Fasmer OB, Haavik J (2010) Bipolar symptoms in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a cross-sectional study of 510 clinically diagnosed patients and 417 population-based controls. J Clin Psychiatry 71:48–57 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources