Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar;34(3):1353-1365.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06915-7. Epub 2019 Jun 17.

Outcomes in conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted primary bariatric surgery: a retrospective, case-controlled study of the MBSAQIP database

Edwin Acevedo Jr  1 , Michael Mazzei  1 , Huaqing Zhao  2 , Xiaoning Lu  2 , Rohit Soans  1 , Michael A Edwards  3
Affiliations

Outcomes in conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted primary bariatric surgery: a retrospective, case-controlled study of the MBSAQIP database

Edwin Acevedo Jr et al. Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: Robotic-assisted bariatric surgery is increasingly performed. There remains controversy about the overall benefit of robotic-assisted (RBS) compared to conventional laparoscopic (LBS) bariatric surgery. In this study, we used a large national risk-stratified bariatric clinical database to compare outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass (RNYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG).

Methods: A retrospective analysis of the 2015 and 2016 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Participant Use Data File (PUF) was performed. Primary robotic and laparoscopic RYNGB and SG were analyzed. Descriptive analysis was performed of the unmatched cohorts, followed by 1:3 case-controlled matching. Cases and controls were matched by patient demographics and pre-operative comorbidities, and peri-operative outcomes compared.

Results: 77,991 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RnYGB) (7.5% robotic-assisted) and 189,503 SG (6.8% robotic-assisted) cases were identified. Operative length was significantly higher in both the robotic-assisted RnYGB and SG cohorts (p < 0.0001). Outcomes were similar between the robotic-assisted and laparoscopic RnYGB cohorts, except a lower mortality rate (p = 0.05), transfusion requirement (p = 0.005), aggregate bleeding (p = 0.04), and surgical site infections (SSI) (p = 0.006) in the robotic-assisted cohort. Outcomes were also similar between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic SG, except for a longer length of stay (p < 0.0001) and higher rates of conversion (p < 0.0001), 30-day intervention (p = 0.01), operative drain present (p < 0.0001), sepsis (p = 0.01), and organ space SSI (p = 0.0002) in the robotic cohort. Bleeding was lower in the robotic SG cohort and mortality was similar.

Conclusion: Both robotic-assisted and laparoscopic RnYGB and SG are overall very safe. Robotic-assisted gastric bypass is associated with a lower mortality and morbidity; however, a clear benefit for robotic-assisted SG compared to laparoscopic SG was not seen. Given the longer operative and hospital duration, robotic SG is not cost-effective.

Keywords: Conventional laparoscopic; Primary bariatric surgery; Robotic-assisted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Drs. Edwin Acevedo, Jr., Michael Mazzei, Huaqing Zhao, Rohit Soans, Michael A. Edwards, and Mr. Xioaoning Lu have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Case selection flow diagram. Flow diagram outlining case inclusion and exclusion criteria. MBSAQIP PUF Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Project Participant Use Data File, CPT CPT
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. World Health Organization (2018) Obesity and overweight. World Health Organization.http://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight. Accessed Sept 24 2018
    1. ASMBS. (2018). The Impact of Obesity on Your Body and Health. https://asmbs.org/patients/impact-of-obesity. Accessed Sept 24 2018
    1. Mason EE, Ito C. Gastric Bypass in Obesity. Obes Res. 1996;4(3):316–319. doi: 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1996.tb00553.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Elias AA, et al. Robotic-assisted bariatric surgery: case series analysis and comparison with the laparoscopic approach. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2018;45(3):e1806. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20181806. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang Y, Zhu C, Wen X, Li L, Rampersad S, Lu L, Zhou D, Qian C, Cui R, Zhang M, Yang P, Qu S, Bu L. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy improves body composition and alleviates insulin resistance in obesity related acanthosis nigricans. Lipids Health Dis. 2017;16(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12944-017-0598-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms