Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan;30(1):291-300.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06289-3. Epub 2019 Jun 17.

Baseline 3D-ADC outperforms 2D-ADC in predicting response to treatment in patients with colorectal liver metastases

Affiliations

Baseline 3D-ADC outperforms 2D-ADC in predicting response to treatment in patients with colorectal liver metastases

Daniel Fadaei Fouladi et al. Eur Radiol. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the value of baseline 3D-ADC and to predict short-term response to treatment in patients with hepatic colorectal metastases (CLMs).

Methods: Liver MR images of 546 patients with CLMs (2008-2015) were reviewed retrospectively and 68 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria. Patients had received systemic chemotherapy (n = 17), hepatic trans-arterial chemoembolization or TACE (n = 34), and 90Y radioembolization (n = 17). Baseline (pre-treatment) 3D-ADC (volumetric) of metastatic lesions was calculated employing prototype software. RECIST 1.1 was used to assess short-term response to treatment. Prediction of response to treatment by baseline 3D-ADC and 2D-ADC (ROI-based) was also compared in all patients.

Results: Partial response to treatment (minimum 30% decrease in tumor largest transverse diameter) was seen in 35.3% of patients; 41.2% with systemic chemotherapy, 32.4% with TACE, and 35.3% with 90Y radioembolization (p = 0.82). Median baseline 3D-ADC was significantly lower in responding than in nonresponding lesions. Area under the curve (AUC) of 3D-ADC was 0.90 in 90Y radioembolization patients, 0.88 in TACE patients, and 0.77 in systemic chemotherapy patients (p < 0.01). Optimal prediction was observed with the 10th percentile of ADC (1006 × 10-6 mm2/s), yielding sensitivity and specificity of 77.4% and 91.3%, respectively. 3D-ADC outperformed 2D-ADC in predicting response to treatment (AUC; 0.86 vs. 0.71; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Baseline 3D-ADC is a highly specific biomarker in predicting partial short-term response to treatment in hepatic CLMs.

Key points: • Baseline 3D-ADC is a highly specific biomarker in predicting response to different treatments in hepatic CLMs. • The prediction level of baseline ADC is better for90Y radioembolization than for systemic chemotherapy/TACE in hepatic CLMs. • 3D-ADC outperforms 2D-ADC in predicting short-term response to treatment in hepatic CLMs.

Keywords: Colorectal neoplasms; Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Liver neoplasms; RECIST.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nosher JL, Ahmed I, Patel AN et al (2015) Non-operative therapies for colorectal liver metastases. J Gastrointest Oncol 6:224–240 - PubMed - PMC
    1. Donadon M, Ribero D, Morris-Stiff G, Abdalla EK, Vauthey JN (2007) New paradigm in the management of liver-only metastases from colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Cancer Res 1:20–27 - PubMed - PMC
    1. Adam R, Kitano Y (2019) Multidisciplinary approach of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 3:50–56 - DOI
    1. Oki E, Ando K, Nakanishi R et al (2018) Recent advances in treatment for colorectal liver metastasis. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2:167–175 - DOI
    1. Kanat O, Gewirtz A, Kemeny N (2012) What is the potential role of hepatic arterial infusion chemo-therapy in the current armamentorium against colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 3:130–138 - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources