Flexible GnRH Antagonist Protocol versus Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) Protocol in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Ovarian Response
- PMID: 31209815
- DOI: 10.1007/s11596-019-2055-x
Flexible GnRH Antagonist Protocol versus Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) Protocol in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Ovarian Response
Abstract
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common causes of infertility in women. Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol, which used oral progestin to prevent premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges in ovarian stimulation, has been proved to be effective and safe in patients with PCOS. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of PPOS protocol with that of the traditional gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol in patients with PCOS. A total of 157 patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) were recruited into this study. The patients were divided into two groups by the stimulation protocols: the GnRH antagonist protocol group and the PPOS protocol group. There was no significant difference in the clinical characteristics between the two groups. Dose and duration of gonadotropin were higher in the PPOS protocol group. Estradiol levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration were significantly lower in the PPOS protocol group. Fertilization rates and the number of good quality embryos were similar between the two groups. Remarkably, we found 6 patients with moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in the GnRH antagonist protocol group but 0 in the PPOS protocol group. A total of 127 women completed their frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of clinical pregnancy rate per transfer, implantation rate, first-trimester miscarriage rate and on-going pregnancy rate per transfer. To conclude, PPOS protocol decreased the incidence of OHSS without adversely affecting clinical outcomes in patients with PCOS.
Keywords: GnRH antagonist protocol; controlled ovarian hyperstimulation; ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome; polycystic ovary syndrome; progestin-primed ovarian stimulation.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 19;14:1224858. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1224858. eCollection 2023. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 37795363 Free PMC article.
-
The use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to induce oocyte maturation after cotreatment with GnRH antagonist in high-risk patients undergoing in vitro fertilization prevents the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a prospective randomized controlled study.Fertil Steril. 2008 Jan;89(1):84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.02.002. Epub 2007 Apr 26. Fertil Steril. 2008. PMID: 17462639 Clinical Trial.
-
Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation is a feasible method for poor ovarian responders undergoing in IVF/ICSI compared to a GnRH antagonist protocol: A retrospective study.J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019 Feb;48(2):99-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.10.008. Epub 2018 Oct 12. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019. PMID: 30321608
-
Progestin primed ovarian stimulation using corifollitropin alfa in PCOS women effectively prevents LH surge and reduces injection burden compared to GnRH antagonist protocol.Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 23;11(1):22732. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02227-w. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34815477 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison the effects of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol and GnRH-a long protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve function.Gynecol Endocrinol. 2023 Dec;39(1):2217263. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2023.2217263. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2023. PMID: 37236243 Review.
Cited by
-
GnRH antagonist protocol versus progestin-primed ovarian stimulation in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Apr;309(4):1151-1163. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07269-1. Epub 2023 Nov 13. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024. PMID: 37957365 Review.
-
Controlled ovarian stimulation protocols for assisted reproduction: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 1;7(7):CD012586. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012586.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 40590303 Review.
-
Efficacy of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 19;14:1224858. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1224858. eCollection 2023. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 37795363 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of progestin ovarian stimulation on newborn outcomes: a meta-analysis.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 May;37(5):1203-1212. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01755-0. Epub 2020 Mar 25. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020. PMID: 32215824 Free PMC article.
-
The efficacy of dydrogesterone use to suppress premature luteinizing hormone surge on cycle outcomes in controlled ovarian stimulation.J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2021 Dec 6;22(4):293-299. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2020.2020.0110. Epub 2021 Jan 4. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2021. PMID: 33389927 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical