Safety and effectiveness of the da Vinci robot with the "3+2" mode for distal pancreatectomy
- PMID: 31210421
- PMCID: PMC6675730
- DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2353
Safety and effectiveness of the da Vinci robot with the "3+2" mode for distal pancreatectomy
Abstract
Background: Recently, no relevant research has focused on the relationship between the clinical efficacy of da Vinci robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) and the number of mechanical arms and assistants used for RDP. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and advantages of RDP with the "3 + 2" mode.
Methods: Clinical data from 53 patients (observation group) who received RDP using the "3 + 2" mode in our department, from March 2016 to September 2018, were reviewed. An additional 53 patients who received RDP using the classical mode were chosen at random for the control group. Short-term outcomes for the two groups were compared.
Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups for estimated blood loss, postoperative day of flatus passage, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complication (P > 0.05). Compared with the control group, the observation group had a significantly shorter operative time (166.9 ± 13.3 vs 192.6 ± 11.1 minutes, P < 0.001), lower surgical costs ($2827.79 ± $173.02 vs $3900.63 ± $317.29, P < 0.001).
Conclusions: The RDP using the "3 + 2" mode can increase the exposure of surgical field, improve cooperation between assistants, lower the surgical costs, and shorten the operative time and learning curve. Moreover, the clinical effect is equal to that of RDP using the classical mode. These findings indicate that RDP using the "3 + 2" mode is safe and feasible for institutions that are equipped for robot-assisted surgery.
Keywords: distal pancreatectomy; pancreatic neoplasm; robotic surgical; “3+2” mode.
© 2019 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Weipeng Zhan, Ming Hu, Caiwen Han, Hongwei Tian, Wutang Jing, Xiaofei Li, Hao Shi, Xiaojun Yang, Tiankang Guo, He Su, Yuntao Ma have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a French prospective single-center experience and cost-effectiveness analysis.Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3562-3569. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6080-9. Epub 2018 Feb 2. Surg Endosc. 2018. PMID: 29396754 Clinical Trial.
-
[Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a retrospective single-center study].Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Feb 1;57(2):102-107. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2019.02.006. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019. PMID: 30704212 Chinese.
-
Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for PNETs: laparoscopic or robotic approach?Oncotarget. 2017 May 16;8(20):33872-33883. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17513. Oncotarget. 2017. PMID: 28477012 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy - The first meta-analysis.HPB (Oxford). 2016 Jul;18(7):567-74. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 May 20. HPB (Oxford). 2016. PMID: 27346136 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy on perioperative outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Updates Surg. 2023 Jan;75(1):7-21. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01413-3. Epub 2022 Nov 15. Updates Surg. 2023. PMID: 36378464 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Da Vinci robot-assisted retroperitoneal tumor resection in 105 patients: a single-center experience.Front Oncol. 2024 Jul 23;14:1414780. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1414780. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39109284 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic distal gastrectomy using a novel pre-emptive supra-pancreatic approach without duodenal transection in the dissection of D2 lymph nodes for gastric cancer.Front Oncol. 2024 May 28;14:1388626. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1388626. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38863643 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Stauffer JA, Asbun HJ. Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery. Semin Oncol. 2015;42(1):123‐133. - PubMed
-
- Hashimoto D, Arima K, Chikamoto A, et al. Limited resection of the duodenum for nonampullary duodenal tumors, with review of the literature. Am Surg. 2016;82(11):1126‐1132. - PubMed
-
- Vijan SS, Ahmed KA, Harmsen WS, et al. Laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy: a single‐institution comparative study. Arch Surg. 2010;145(7):616‐621. - PubMed
-
- Liu QU, Tang W, Zhou R, et al. Robotic distal pancreatectomy: experience in a high‐volume center. Ann Pancreat Cancer. 2018;1:363‐368.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials