Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2019 May 29:13:1179069519851809.
doi: 10.1177/1179069519851809. eCollection 2019.

Dissecting Static and Dynamic Functional Connectivity: Example From the Autism Spectrum

Affiliations
Comment

Dissecting Static and Dynamic Functional Connectivity: Example From the Autism Spectrum

Tonya White et al. J Exp Neurosci. .

Abstract

The ability to measure the intrinsic functional architecture of the brain has grown exponentially over the last 2 decades. Measures of intrinsic connectivity within the brain, typically measured using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have evolved from primarily "static" approaches, to include dynamic measures of functional connectivity. Measures of dynamic functional connectivity expand the assumptions to allow brain regions to have temporally different patterns of communication between different regions. That is, connections within the brain can differentially fire between different regions at different times, and these differences can be quantified. Applying approaches that measure the dynamic characteristics of functional brain connectivity have been fruitful in identifying differences during brain development and psychopathology. We provide a brief overview of static and dynamic measures of functional connectivity and illustrate the synergy in applying these approaches to identify both age-related differences in children and differences between typically developing children and children with autistic symptoms.

Keywords: Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging; autism spectrum disorders; children; development; neurodevelopment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests:The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Simulated example of a network where the (C) right parietal region communicates differentially between the (B) left parietal region and the (A) right prefrontal region. The light blue rectangles reflect the regions in the time series in which the correlations are highest between (A) and (B) and the light red rectangles reflect the regions of highest correlation between (A) and (C).

Comment on

References

    1. Calhoun VD, Adali T. Multisubject independent component analysis of fMRI: a decade of intrinsic networks, default mode, and neurodiagnostic discovery. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2012;5:60–73. doi:10.1109/RBME.2012.2211076. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muetzel RL, Blanken LME, Thijssen S, et al. Resting-state networks in 6-to-10 year old children. Hum Brain Mapp. 2016;37:4286–4300. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith SM, Fox PT, Miller KL, et al. Correspondence of the brain’s functional architecture during activation and rest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:13040–13045. doi:10.1073/pnas.0905267106. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Calhoun VD, Kiehl KA, Pearlson GD. Modulation of temporally coherent brain networks estimated using ICA at rest and during cognitive tasks. Hum Brain Mapp. 2008;29:828–838. doi:10.1002/hbm.20581. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Preti MG, Bolton TA, van de Ville D. The dynamic functional connectome: state-of-the-art and perspectives. Neuroimage. 2017;160:41–54. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.061. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources