Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun;7(5):673-681.
doi: 10.1177/2050640619842442. Epub 2019 Apr 3.

Establishing an indwelling peritoneal catheter as a standard procedure for hospitalized patients with ascites: Retrospective data on feasibility, effectiveness and safety

Affiliations

Establishing an indwelling peritoneal catheter as a standard procedure for hospitalized patients with ascites: Retrospective data on feasibility, effectiveness and safety

Katharina Stratmann et al. United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The use of an indwelling peritoneal catheter system in hospitalized patients with ascites could facilitate patient management by the prevention of repetitive abdominal paracentesis. Despite these possible benefits, the use of indwelling catheters is not widely established.

Objective: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness and safety of the use of an indwelling catheter for ascites drainage in the clinical routine.

Methods: This retrospective study included all indwelling peritoneal catheter placements in our department in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis between 2014 and 2017.

Results: A total of 324 indwelling catheter placements for ascites in 192 hospitalized patients with cirrhosis were included. The catheter (7F, 8 cm) was placed ultrasound-assisted bed-side on the hospital ward. The technical success rate of the catheter placement was 99.7% (323/324). In 17.5% (64/324) the catheter was placed to optimize ascitic drainage prior to an abdominal intervention (e.g. transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt). The median time of catheter retention was 48 hours (8-168 hours) and the median cumulative amount of drained ascites 8000 ml (550-28,000). The most common adverse event was acute kidney injury (49/324, 15.1%); the risk was particularly higher in patients with a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score ≥ 16 (p = 0.028; odds ratio 2.039). Ascitic fistula after catheter removal was observed in 9.6% (31/324). Catheter-related infections occurred in 4.3% (14/324), and bleeding was documented in three cases (0.8%) with one major bleeding (0.3%).

Conclusion: The placement of an indwelling catheter for repetitive ascitic drainage in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis can be established in the clinical routine, facilitating patient management. High-MELD patients especially have to be monitored for acute kidney injury.

Keywords: Ascites; MELD; cirrhosis; indwelling catheter; peritoneal drainage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flowchart of patient selection for either large-volume paracentesis (LVP) or indwelling peritoneal catheter. All consecutive patients between January 2014 and December 2017 were included in the study. Grade 3 ascites: Large or gross ascites that provokes marked abdominal distension. SBP: spontaneous bacterial peritonitis; TIPS: transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. *Patients with malignant ascites were not included in the study although this is not a general contraindication for an indwelling peritoneal catheter.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Preparation for peritoneal catheter placement. (a) 7 F peritoneal catheter with needle, (b) connection tube, (c) suture, (d) needle holder, (e) scalpel, (f) drainage bag.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Drainage of ascites in cirrhosis.
    Yang JX, Peng YM, Zeng HT, Lin XM, Xu ZL. Yang JX, et al. World J Hepatol. 2024 Sep 27;16(9):1245-1257. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v16.i9.1245. World J Hepatol. 2024. PMID: 39351514 Free PMC article. Review.

References

    1. D’Amico G, Garcia-Tsao G, Pagliaro L. Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: A systematic review of 118 studies. J Hepatol 2006; 44: 217–231. - PubMed
    1. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol 2018; 69: 406–460. - PubMed
    1. Runyon BA. Introduction to the revised American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Practice Guideline management of adult patients with ascites due to cirrhosis 2012. Hepatology 2013; 57: 1651–1653. - PubMed
    1. Gaba RC, Khiatani VL, Knuttinen MG, et al. Comprehensive review of TIPS technical complications and how to avoid them. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196: 675–685. - PubMed
    1. Ripamonti R, Ferral H, Alonzo M, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt-related complications and practical solutions. Semin Intervent Radiol 2006; 23: 165–176. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms