Establishing an indwelling peritoneal catheter as a standard procedure for hospitalized patients with ascites: Retrospective data on feasibility, effectiveness and safety
- PMID: 31210945
- PMCID: PMC6545707
- DOI: 10.1177/2050640619842442
Establishing an indwelling peritoneal catheter as a standard procedure for hospitalized patients with ascites: Retrospective data on feasibility, effectiveness and safety
Abstract
Background: The use of an indwelling peritoneal catheter system in hospitalized patients with ascites could facilitate patient management by the prevention of repetitive abdominal paracentesis. Despite these possible benefits, the use of indwelling catheters is not widely established.
Objective: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness and safety of the use of an indwelling catheter for ascites drainage in the clinical routine.
Methods: This retrospective study included all indwelling peritoneal catheter placements in our department in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis between 2014 and 2017.
Results: A total of 324 indwelling catheter placements for ascites in 192 hospitalized patients with cirrhosis were included. The catheter (7F, 8 cm) was placed ultrasound-assisted bed-side on the hospital ward. The technical success rate of the catheter placement was 99.7% (323/324). In 17.5% (64/324) the catheter was placed to optimize ascitic drainage prior to an abdominal intervention (e.g. transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt). The median time of catheter retention was 48 hours (8-168 hours) and the median cumulative amount of drained ascites 8000 ml (550-28,000). The most common adverse event was acute kidney injury (49/324, 15.1%); the risk was particularly higher in patients with a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score ≥ 16 (p = 0.028; odds ratio 2.039). Ascitic fistula after catheter removal was observed in 9.6% (31/324). Catheter-related infections occurred in 4.3% (14/324), and bleeding was documented in three cases (0.8%) with one major bleeding (0.3%).
Conclusion: The placement of an indwelling catheter for repetitive ascitic drainage in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis can be established in the clinical routine, facilitating patient management. High-MELD patients especially have to be monitored for acute kidney injury.
Keywords: Ascites; MELD; cirrhosis; indwelling catheter; peritoneal drainage.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Home-based drainage of refractory ascites by a permanent-tunneled peritoneal catheter can safely replace large-volume paracentesis.Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 May;29(5):539-546. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000837. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017. PMID: 28350743
-
Indwelling peritoneal catheters in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites.Intern Med J. 2015 Oct;45(10):1026-31. doi: 10.1111/imj.12843. Intern Med J. 2015. PMID: 26122531
-
Palliative long-term abdominal drains versus repeated drainage in individuals with untreatable ascites due to advanced cirrhosis: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial.Trials. 2018 Jul 27;19(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2779-0. Trials. 2018. PMID: 30053891 Free PMC article.
-
Permanent indwelling peritoneal catheters for palliation of refractory ascites in end-stage liver disease: A systematic review.Liver Int. 2019 Sep;39(9):1594-1607. doi: 10.1111/liv.14162. Epub 2019 Jul 17. Liver Int. 2019. PMID: 31152623
-
PleurX peritoneal catheter drainage system for vacuum-assisted drainage of treatment-resistant, recurrent malignant ascites: a NICE Medical Technology Guidance.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2012 Sep 1;10(5):299-308. doi: 10.1007/BF03261864. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2012. PMID: 22779402 Review.
Cited by
-
Drainage of ascites in cirrhosis.World J Hepatol. 2024 Sep 27;16(9):1245-1257. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v16.i9.1245. World J Hepatol. 2024. PMID: 39351514 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- D’Amico G, Garcia-Tsao G, Pagliaro L. Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: A systematic review of 118 studies. J Hepatol 2006; 44: 217–231. - PubMed
-
- EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol 2018; 69: 406–460. - PubMed
-
- Runyon BA. Introduction to the revised American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Practice Guideline management of adult patients with ascites due to cirrhosis 2012. Hepatology 2013; 57: 1651–1653. - PubMed
-
- Gaba RC, Khiatani VL, Knuttinen MG, et al. Comprehensive review of TIPS technical complications and how to avoid them. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196: 675–685. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical