Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jun 3;4(6):330-336.
doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180077. eCollection 2019 Jun.

Registry stakeholders

Affiliations
Review

Registry stakeholders

Anne Lübbeke et al. EFORT Open Rev. .

Abstract

Clinical registries are health information systems, which have the mission to collect multidimensional real-world data over the long term, and to generate relevant information and actionable knowledge to address current serious healthcare problems.This article provides an overview of clinical registries and their relevant stakeholders, focussing on registry structure and functioning, each stakeholder's specific interests, and on their involvement in the registry's information input and output.Stakeholders of clinical registries include the patients, healthcare providers (professionals and facilities), financiers (government, insurance companies), public health and regulatory agencies, industry, the research community and the media.The article discusses (1) challenges in stakeholder interaction and how to strengthen the central role of the patient, (2) the importance of adding cost reporting to enable informed value choices, and (3) the need for proof of clinical and public health utility of registries.In its best form, a registry is a mission-driven, independent stakeholder-registry team collaboration that enables rapid, transparent and open-access knowledge generation and dissemination. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180077.

Keywords: health information system; registry; stakeholder.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

ICMJE Conflict of interest statement: PH declares grants from Fondation pour la recherche ostéoarticulaire. He is a board member of Fondation pour la recherche ostéoarticulaire and the Swiss Foundation for Innovation and Training in Surgery (SFITS), and he is the Editor-in-Chief of EFORT Open Reviews. AL is an editorial board member of EFORT Open Reviews and a board member of Fondation pour la recherche ostéoarticulaire. AJC has nothing to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Registry stakeholders: relevant and interested parties and their relationships with the registry.

References

    1. Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA, Leavy MB, eds. Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: a user’s guide. Third ed. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2014. [Internet] - PubMed
    1. Hoque DME, Kumari V, Hoque M, et al. Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and clinical outcomes: a systematic review. PLoS One 2017;12:e0183667. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Olsen LA, Aisner D, McGinnis JM, eds. The learning healthcare system: workshop summary. Institute of Medicine (IOM) Roundtable on Evidence-Based Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2007 - PubMed
    1. Lehoux P, Williams-Jones B, Miller F, Urbach D, Tailliez S. What leads to better health care innovation? Arguments for an integrated policy-oriented research agenda. J Health Serv Res Policy 2008;13:251–254. - PubMed
    1. Cnudde P, Nemes S, Bülow E, et al. Trends in hip replacements between 1999 and 2012 in Sweden. J Orthop Res 2018;36:432–442. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources