Cesarean delivery in Nigeria: prevalence and associated factors-a population-based cross-sectional study
- PMID: 31213450
- PMCID: PMC6596937
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027273
Cesarean delivery in Nigeria: prevalence and associated factors-a population-based cross-sectional study
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the prevalence and factors associated with caesarean delivery in Nigeria.
Design: This is a secondary analysis of the nationally representative 2013 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) data. We carried out frequency tabulation, χ2 test, simple logistic regression and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses to achieve the study objective.
Setting: Nigeria.
Participants: A total of 31 171 most recent live deliveries for women aged 15-49 years (mother-child pair) in the 5 years preceding the 2013 NDHS was included in this study.
Outcome measure: Caesarean mode of delivery.
Results: The prevalence of caesarean section (CS) was 2.1% (95% CI 1.8 to 2.3) in Nigeria. At the region level, the South-West had the highest prevalence of 4.7%. Factors associated with increased odds of CS were urban residence (adjusted OR (AOR): 1.51, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.97), maternal age ≥35 years (AOR: 2.12, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.11), large birth size (AOR: 1.39, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.74) and multiple births (AOR: 4.96, 95% CI 2.84 to 8.62). Greater odds of CS were equally associated with maternal obesity (AOR: 3.16, 95% CI 2.30 to 4.32), Christianity (AOR: 2.06, 95% CI 1.58 to 2.68), birth order of one (AOR: 3.86, 95% CI 2.66 to 5.56), husband's secondary/higher education level (AOR: 2.07, 95% CI 1.29 to 3.33), health insurance coverage (AOR: 2.01, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.95) and ≥4 antenatal visits (AOR: 2.84, 95% CI 1.56 to 5.17).
Conclusions: The prevalence of CS was low, indicating unmet needs in the use of caesarean delivery in Nigeria. Rural-urban, regional and socioeconomic differences were observed, suggesting inequitable access to the obstetric surgery. Intervention efforts need to prioritise women living in rural areas, the North-East and the North-West regions, as well as women of the Islamic faith.
Keywords: Nigeria; caesarean section; epidemiology; maternal health; public health; reproductivemedicine.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Home childbirth among young mothers aged 15-24 years in Nigeria: a national population-based cross-sectional study.BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 18;9(9):e025494. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025494. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31537553 Free PMC article.
-
Caesarean section and associated factors in Nigeria: assessing inequalities between rural and urban areas-insights from the Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Aug 14;24(1):538. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06722-6. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024. PMID: 39143541 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence and associated factors of caesarean section delivery: analysis from the Nepal Demographic and Health Survey 2022.BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 22;15(3):e090209. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090209. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 40122542 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of over and underuse of caesarean births in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: an updated review.East Mediterr Health J. 2019 Nov 25;25(11):837-846. doi: 10.26719/emhj.19.033. East Mediterr Health J. 2019. PMID: 31782521
-
Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections.Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1341-1348. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7. Lancet. 2018. PMID: 30322584 Review.
Cited by
-
Prevalence and factors associated with caesarean section in Rwanda: a trend analysis of Rwanda demographic and health survey 2000 to 2019-20.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 May 16;22(1):410. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04679-y. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022. PMID: 35578320 Free PMC article.
-
Obstetric Outcomes in High-Order Repeat Caesarean Deliveries in Nigeria: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.J Family Reprod Health. 2022 Dec;16(4):254-263. doi: 10.18502/jfrh.v16i4.11356. J Family Reprod Health. 2022. PMID: 37465427 Free PMC article.
-
A multi-level analysis of prevalence and factors associated with caesarean section in Nigeria.PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Jun 26;3(6):e0000688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000688. eCollection 2023. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37363888 Free PMC article.
-
Rural-urban disparities in caesarean deliveries in sub-Saharan Africa: a multivariate non-linear decomposition modelling of Demographic and Health Survey data.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Sep 17;22(1):709. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04992-6. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022. PMID: 36115842 Free PMC article.
-
Cesarean Delivery Trends in Conflict-Affected Settings: Prevalence, Predictors, and Outcomes at a Rural Referral Hospital in Yemen.Cureus. 2025 Apr 10;17(4):e82027. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82027. eCollection 2025 Apr. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40352045 Free PMC article.
References
-
- WHO. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. Geneva: World Health Organization. Geneva 2015.
-
- Baron YM. Does the 10–15% caesarean section rate threshold established by the WHO in 1985 still apply for modern obstetrics in developed countries? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016;206:e81.
-
- Gibbons L, Belizán JM, Lauer JA, et al. . The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary caesarean sections performed per year: overuse as a barrier to universal coverage. World health report 2010;30:1–31.
-
- WHO. UNFPA, UNICEF. AMDD: Monitoring emergency obstetric care: a handbook. Geneva 2009.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical