Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 May 24:12:4075-4080.
doi: 10.2147/OTT.S205922. eCollection 2019.

Progress in the identification of gene mutations involved in multiple myeloma

Affiliations
Review

Progress in the identification of gene mutations involved in multiple myeloma

Ying Hu et al. Onco Targets Ther. .

Abstract

Sequencing studies have been used to determine a spectrum of multiple myeloma (MM) mutations. Mutation of certain genes, including KRAS, NRAS, TP53, FAM46C, DIS3 and BRAF, have a high recurrence rate and may play important roles in the pathogenesis, progression and prognosis of MM. Mutations in DIS3, which encodes a highly conserved RNA exonuclease, lead to loss of function. The expression of FAM46C is highly correlated with the expression of ribosomal protein, but the exact function of FAM46C mutation is unclear. There are mutants of IRF4, which is considered an MM survival factor. Mutations in the gene coding for the DNA damage-binding protein (DDB1) may affect interactions with CUL4A, which is part of the cereblon (CRBN) ubiquitin ligase complex. IRF4is part of the complex, which binds to DNA. These findings might explain the resistance to immunomodulatory. TP53 deletion or mutation is often present in B-cell malignancies and is associated with low response rates. Myeloma pathogenic mutations in ATM have been found in adult lymphatic tumors. XBP1 and PSMB5 mutations may be related to bortezomib resistance. Multiple gene mutations (KRAS, NRAS and BRAF) involved in the same pathway were found a single patient. Identification of driver gene mutations has brought great hope to the field of individualized, targeted medicine for MM.

Keywords: cytogenetic abnormalities; gene mutations; multiple myeloma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Recurrent gene mutation incidence in the newly diagnosed MM.,,

References

    1. Lohr JG, Stojanov P, Carter SL. Widespread genetic heterogeneity in multiple myeloma: implications for targeted therapy. Cancer Cell. 2014;25(1):91–101. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2013.12.015 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kortüm KM, Langer C, Monge J. Targeted sequencing using a 47 gene multiple myeloma mutation panel (M 3 P) in −17p high risk disease. Br J Haematol. 2015;168(4):507–510. doi:10.1111/bjh.13171 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Munshi NC, Anderson KC, Bergsagel PL. Consensus recommendations for risk stratification in multiple myeloma: report of the International myeloma workshop consensus panel 2. Blood. 2011;117(18):4696–4700. doi:10.1182/blood-2010-10-300970 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lai YY, Huang XJ, Cai Z. Prognostic power of abnormal cytogenetics for multiple myeloma: a multicenter study in China. Chin Med J. 2012;125(15):2663–2670. - PubMed
    1. Sonneveld P, Avet-Loiseau H, Lonial S. Treatment of multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics: a consensus of the International myeloma working group. Blood. 2016;127(24):2955–2962. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-01-631200 - DOI - PMC - PubMed