Migrated intrauterine device presented as anterior abdominal wall abscess
- PMID: 31214315
- PMCID: PMC6565824
- DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjz174
Migrated intrauterine device presented as anterior abdominal wall abscess
Abstract
The migrated intrauterine contraceptive device can cause various presentations depending on the location, some may have late presentations like our case presenting after 5 years and after pregnancy and delivery by cesarean section. A 34-year-old lady had painful suprapubic mass for 1-week, with fever. She had history of intrauterine device (IUD) placed before 5 years. The patient became pregnant 1 year before presentation and delivery done by cesarean section. Examination showed a tender mass 3 cm above the scar of the previous cesarean section. The clinical picture was consistent with abdominal wall abscess. During surgery pus drained and the IUD extracted from the cavity of the abscess. High index of suspicion is needed when there is history of missed IUD and any abdominal complain. Abdominal X-ray and ultrasound will give better diagnostic value. Most cases need surgical extraction of the device which can be done laparoscopically.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Case report: An intrauterine device hugging the musculus rectus abdominis through the center of a cesarean scar.Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:956856. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.956856. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2023. PMID: 36684317 Free PMC article.
-
Abdominal wall abscess presenting 35 years after insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device.Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Feb;115(2 Pt 2):458-459. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181bb2554. Obstet Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 20093879
-
Cystoscopic removal of a migrated intrauterine device to the bladder; a case report.Contracept Reprod Med. 2019 Jul 1;4:7. doi: 10.1186/s40834-019-0089-x. eCollection 2019. Contracept Reprod Med. 2019. PMID: 31304041 Free PMC article.
-
Uterine rupture after induction of labour for intrauterine death using the prostaglandin E2 analogue sulprostone.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 Aug;32(3):282-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1992.tb01968.x. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992. PMID: 1445147 Review.
-
Perforation of the bladder by the intrauterine device.Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1984 Feb;39(2):59-66. doi: 10.1097/00006254-198402000-00001. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1984. PMID: 6229704 Review.
Cited by
-
Migrated intra-uterine device to infra-umbilical skin: a rare case report.BMC Womens Health. 2024 Dec 30;24(1):672. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03522-0. BMC Womens Health. 2024. PMID: 39736668 Free PMC article.
-
Intrauterine Device Migration: A Diagnostic and Management Dilemma.Cureus. 2024 Apr 5;16(4):e57637. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57637. eCollection 2024 Apr. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38707021 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Elahi N, Koukab H. Diagnosis and management of lost intrauterine contraceptive device. J Pak Med Assoc 2002;52:18–20. - PubMed
-
- Bednarek PH, Creinin MD, Reeves MF, Cwiak C, Espey E, Jensen JT. Immediate versus delayed IUD insertion after uterine aspiration. N Engl J Med 2011;364:2208–17. - PubMed
-
- Rivera R, Yacobson I, Grimes D. The mechanism of action of hormonal contraceptives and intrauterine contraceptive devices. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:1263–9. - PubMed
-
- Hasanain F. The misplaced IUD. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2002;78:251–2. - PubMed
-
- Yilmaz Y, Bayrakli H, Cecen K, Güneş M. An unusual foreign body in the bladder. Eastern J Med 2002;7:43–4.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources