Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar;44(1):56-79.
doi: 10.1007/s11013-019-09635-8.

Ebola and Localized Blame on Social Media: Analysis of Twitter and Facebook Conversations During the 2014-2015 Ebola Epidemic

Affiliations

Ebola and Localized Blame on Social Media: Analysis of Twitter and Facebook Conversations During the 2014-2015 Ebola Epidemic

Melissa Roy et al. Cult Med Psychiatry. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze main groups accused on social media of causing or spreading the 2014-2016 Ebola epidemic in West Africa. In this analysis, blame is construed as a vehicle of meaning through which the lay public makes sense of an epidemic, and through which certain classes of people become "figures of blame". Data was collected from Twitter and Facebook using key word extraction, then categorized thematically. Our findings indicate an overall proximate blame tendency: blame was typically cast on "near-by" figures, namely national governments, and less so on "distant" figures, such as generalized figures of otherness ("Africans", global health authorities, global elites). Our results also suggest an evolution of online blame. In the early stage of the epidemic, blame directed at the affected populations was more prominent. However, during the peak of the outbreak, the increasingly perceived threat of inter-continental spread was accompanied by a progressively proximal blame tendency, directed at figures with whom the social media users had pre-existing biopolitical frustrations. Our study proposes that pro-active and on-going analysis of blame circulating in social media can usefully help to guide communications strategies, making them more responsive to public perceptions.

Keywords: Blame; Ebola; Health communication; Outbreaks; Social media.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors were paid by an agency to write this article. All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Temporal evolution of the blame of national governments and immigrants
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Temporal evolution of the blame of populations of affected areas, media, elite groups and global health authorities

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abeysinghe Sudeepa. Ebola at the Borders: Newspaper Representations and the Politics of Border Control. Third World Quarterly. 2016;37(3):452–467.
    1. Alnemer Khalid A, Alhuzaim Waleed M, Alnemer Ahmed A, Alharbi Bader B, Bawazir Abdulrahman S, Barayyan Omar R, Balaraj Faisal K. Are Health-Related Tweets Evidence Based? Review and Analysis of Health-Related Tweets on Twitter. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2015;17(10):e246. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atlani-Duault Laëtitia, Mercier Arnaud, Rousseau Cécile, Guyot Paul, Moatti Jean-Paul. “Blood Libel Rebooted: Traditional Scapegoats, Online Media, and the H1N1 Epidemic”. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry. 2015;39:43–61. - PubMed
    1. Basch Corey H, Basch Charles E, Ruggles Kelly V, Hammond Rodney. Coverage of the Ebola Virus Disease Epidemic on Youtube. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness. 2015;9(5):531–535. - PubMed
    1. Braun Virginia, Clarke Victoria. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101.