Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;49(2):434-441.
doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01213-x. Epub 2019 Jun 18.

The role of protected areas in mitigating human impact in the world's last wilderness areas

Affiliations

The role of protected areas in mitigating human impact in the world's last wilderness areas

Emily Anderson et al. Ambio. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Human impact on the environment is evident across the planet, including its most biodiverse areas. Of particular interest is the impact on the world's last wilderness areas, in which the largest patches of land relatively free from human influence remain. Here, we use the human footprint index to measure the extent to which the world's last wilderness areas have been impacted by human activities-between the years 1993 and 2009-and whether protected areas have been effective in reducing human impact. We found that overall the increase in human footprint was higher in tropical than temperate regions. Moreover, although on average the increase was lower inside protected areas than outside, in half of the fourteen biomes examined the differences were insignificant. Although reasons varied, protected areas alone are unlikely to be ubiquitously successful in protecting wilderness areas. To achieve protection, it is important to address loss and improve environmental governance.

Keywords: Biodiversity conservation; Human footprint; IUCN protected areas; Last of the wild; Terrestrial biomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Change in human footprint within each of the three groups of protected areas, classified according to their IUCN Category

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andam KS, Ferraro PJ, Pfaff A, Sanchez-Azofeifa GA, Robalino JA. Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2008;105:16089–16094. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800437105. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andrew N, Nelson A, Chomitz KM. Effectiveness of strict vs. multiple use protected areas in reducing tropical forest fires: A global analysis using matching methods. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e22722–e22722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022722. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brooks TM, Akçakaya HR, Burgess ND, Butchart SHM, Hilton-Taylor C, Hoffmann M, Juffe-Bignoli D, Kingston N, et al. Data from: Analysing biodiversity and conservation knowledge products to support regional environmental assessments. Scientific Data. 2016;3:160007. doi: 10.5061/dryad.6gb90.2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Butchart SHM, Walpole M, Collen B, Van Strien A, Scharlemann JPW, Almond REA, Baillie JEM, Bomhard B, et al. Global biodiversity: Indicators of recent declines. Science. 2010;328:1164–1168. doi: 10.1126/science.1187512. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, Hooper DU, Perrings C, Venail P, Narwani A, Mace GM, et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature. 2012;486:59–67. doi: 10.1038/nature11148. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources