Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct;46(10):952-990.
doi: 10.1111/joor.12842. Epub 2019 Jul 12.

Evaluation of the efficacy of dentin hypersensitivity treatments-A systematic review and follow-up analysis

Affiliations

Evaluation of the efficacy of dentin hypersensitivity treatments-A systematic review and follow-up analysis

Carlos Miguel Marto et al. J Oral Rehabil. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the treatments used to treat dentin hypersensitivity (DH), based on its efficacy and effect duration.

Methods: Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and ClinicalTrials were searched for articles published between 1 January 2008 and 14 November 2018, in English, Portuguese or Spanish, reporting clinical trials, completed and with results. This systematic review protocol was registered in PROSPERO, number CRD42019121986.

Results: Seventy-four randomised clinical trials were included in the systematic review, reporting patients from 16 to 65 years old, with a clinical diagnosis of DH, that evaluate the efficacy of a desensitising product, compared to pre-treatment, used the evaporative method stimulation and the visual analogue scale. These studies evaluated 5366 patients and at least 9167 teeth. Seven follow-up periods were considered corresponding to an immediate, medium or long-time effect. Sixty-six studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. Glutaraldehyde with HEMA, glass ionomer cements and Laser present significant immediate (until 7 days) DH reduction. Medium-term (until 1 month) reduction was observed in stannous fluoride, glutaraldehyde with HEMA, hydroxyapatite, glass ionomer cements and Laser groups. Finally, long-term significant reduction was seen at potassium nitrate, arginine, glutaraldehyde with HEMA, hydroxyapatite, adhesive systems, glass ionomer cements and LASER.

Conclusions: All active ingredients show efficacy in DH reduction in different follow-up times. Only in-office treatments are effective in immediate DH reduction, maintaining its efficacy over time. For long-time effects, at-home treatments can also be used. More standardised evaluation protocols should be implemented to increase the robustly of the results.

Keywords: dentin desensitising agent; dentin hypersensitivity; dentin hypersensitivity treatments; dentin sensitivity; evidence-based dentistry; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Holland GR, Narhi MN, Addy M, Gangarosa L, Orchardson R. Guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials on dentine hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol. 1997;24(11):808-813.
    1. Splieth CH, Tachou A. Epidemiology of dentin hypersensitivity. Clin Oral Invest. 2013;17(S1):S3-S8.
    1. Favaro Zeola L, Soares PV, Cunha-Cruz J. Prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2019;81:1-6.
    1. Idon PI, Esan TA, Bamise CT. Efficacy of three in-office dentin hypersensitivity treatments. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2017;15(3):207-214.
    1. Brannstrom M. Dentin sensitivity and aspiration of odontoblasts. J Am Dent Assoc. 1963;66:366-370.

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources