Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 4;6(1):e000981.
doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000981. eCollection 2019.

Impact of aortic stiffness on myocardial ischaemia in non-obstructive coronary artery disease

Affiliations

Impact of aortic stiffness on myocardial ischaemia in non-obstructive coronary artery disease

Mai Tone Lønnebakken et al. Open Heart. .

Abstract

Objective: High aortic stiffness may reduce myocardial perfusion pressure and contribute to development of myocardial ischaemia. Whether high aortic stiffness is associated with myocardial ischaemia in patients with stable angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) is less explored.

Methods: Aortic stiffness was assessed as carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) by applanation tonometry in 125 patients (62±8 years, 58% women) with stable angina and non-obstructive CAD participating in the Myocardial Ischemia in Non-obstructive CAD project. PWV in the highest tertile (>8.7 m/s) was taken as higher aortic stiffness. Stress-induced myocardial ischaemia was detected as delayed myocardial contrast replenishment during stress echocardiography, and the number of left ventricular (LV) segments with delayed contrast replenishment as the extent of ischaemia.

Results: Patients with higher aortic stiffness were older with higher LV mass index and lower prevalence of obesity (all p<0.05), while angina symptoms, sex, prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, smoking or LV ejection fraction did not differ between groups. Stress-induced myocardial ischaemia was more common (73% vs 42%, p=0.001) and the extent of ischaemia was larger (4±3 vs 2±3 LV segments, p=0.005) in patients with higher aortic stiffness. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, higher aortic stiffness was associated with stress-induced myocardial ischaemia independent of other known covariables (OR 4.74 (95% CI 1.51 to 14.93), p=0.008).

Conclusions: In patients with stable angina and non-obstructive CAD, higher aortic stiffness was associated with stress-induced myocardial ischaemia. Consequently, assessment of aortic stiffness may add to the diagnostic evaluation in patients with non-obstructive CAD.

Trial registration number: NCT01853527.

Keywords: aortic stiffness; myocardial ischemia; non-obstructive coronary artery disease; stable angina.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ROC curve analysis for pulse wave velocity and coronary artery calcium score in assessment of myocardial ischaemia in patients with INOCA. Ca, calcium; INOCA, Ischaemia in non-obstructive coronary artery disease; ROC, receiver operating characteristics.

References

    1. Bairey Merz CN, Pepine CJ, Walsh MN, et al. . Ischemia and NO obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA): developing evidence-based therapies and research agenda for the next decade. Circulation 2017;135:1075–92. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024534 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paul TK, Sivanesan K, Schulman-Marcus J. Sex differences in nonobstructive coronary artery disease: recent insights and substantial knowledge gaps. Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine 2017;27:173–9. 10.1016/j.tcm.2016.08.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schulman-Marcus J, ó Hartaigh B, Gransar H, et al. . Sex-specific associations between coronary artery plaque extent and risk of Major adverse cardiovascular events. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 2016;9:364–72. 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.02.010 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferrari R, Camici PG, Crea F, et al. . Expert consensus document: A 'diamond' approach to personalized treatment of angina. Nature Reviews Cardiology 2018;15:120–32. 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.131 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ford TJ, Corcoran D, Berry C. Stable coronary syndromes: pathophysiology, diagnostic advances and therapeutic need. Heart 2018;104:284–92. 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311446 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data