Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2019 May 14:2019:4584609.
doi: 10.1155/2019/4584609. eCollection 2019.

Congenital Megaprepuce: Literature Review and Surgical Correction

Affiliations
Case Reports

Congenital Megaprepuce: Literature Review and Surgical Correction

Zachary Werner et al. Case Rep Urol. .

Abstract

Congenital megaprepuce (CMP) is a type of buried penis characterized by extensive redundancy and ballooning of the inner prepuce as a result of preputial stenosis and phimosis. The malformation typically presents with difficulty voiding, often requiring manual expression of stagnant urine. Multiple techniques have been reported for the treatment of CMP with varying levels of positive outcomes. The authors provide a review of published literature, in addition to describing the procedure and results of our surgical technique in three children aged eleven months, two years, and twelve years. The literature review was conducted using PubMed with keywords "congenital megaprepuce," "megaprepuce," "buried penis," "CMP," and "correction." Results were then differentiated based on presence or absence of true congenital megaprepuce and the surgical correction thereof. Regarding our cases, all patients completed the procedure with excellent cosmesis and without complication. Our technique is shown to provide consistent, excellent esthetic outcome across a wide range of ages and may be replicated by others.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) shows the buried penis in normal position. (b) further details the extent of the excess inner prepuce.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Isolated dysplastic dartos muscle prior to excision.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Good recreation of the penoscrotal and penopubic angle is shown, in addition to scrotal reapproximation at the midline.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Redemonstration of the penopubic and penoscrotal angles in the two-year-old patient.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Demonstration of excellent cosmesis at eleven-month follow-up.

References

    1. Maizels M., Zaontz M., Donovan J., Bushnick P. N., Firlit C. F. Surgical correction of the buried penis: Description of a classification system and a technique to correct the disorder. The Journal of Urology. 1986;136(1):268–271. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)44837-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Summerton D., Mcnally J., Denny A., Malone P. Congenital megaprepuce: an emerging condition - how to recognize and treat it. BJU International. 2000;86(4):519–522. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2000.00509.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rod J., Desmonts A., Petit T., Ravasse P. Congenital megaprepuce: A 12-year experience (52 cases) of this specific form of buried penis. Journal of Pediatric Urology. 2013;9(6):784–788. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.10.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cimador M., Catalano P., Ortolano R., Giuffrè M. The inconspicuous penis in children. Nature Reviews Urology. 2015;12(4):205–215. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2015.49. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ruiz E., Vagni R., Apostolo C., et al. Simplified surgical approach to congenital megaprepuce: Fixing, unfurling and tailoring revisited. The Journal of Urology. 2011;185(6):2487–2490. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.01.015. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources