Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 20;55(8):1670-1686.
doi: 10.1080/00220388.2018.1448069. eCollection 2019.

Do Participatory Learning and Action Women's Groups Alone or Combined with Cash or Food Transfers Expand Women's Agency in Rural Nepal?

Affiliations

Do Participatory Learning and Action Women's Groups Alone or Combined with Cash or Food Transfers Expand Women's Agency in Rural Nepal?

Lu Gram et al. J Dev Stud. .

Abstract

Participatory learning and action women's groups (PLA) have proven effective in reducing neonatal mortality in rural, high-mortality settings, but their impacts on women's agency in the household remain unknown. Cash transfer programmes have also long targeted female beneficiaries in the belief that this empowers women. Drawing on data from 1309 pregnant women in a four-arm cluster-randomised controlled trial in Nepal, we found little evidence for an impact of PLA alone or combined with unconditional food or cash transfers on women's agency in the household. Caution is advised before assuming PLA women's groups alone or with resource transfers necessarily empower women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure A1.
Figure A1.
Sampling strategy and trial flow.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acharya D. R., Bell J. S., van Tijlingen E. R., & Regmi P. R. (2010). Women’s autonomy in household decision-making: A demographic study in Nepal. Reproductive Health, 7, 1–12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Acharya M., & Bennett L. (1983). Women and the subsistence sector. Economic participation and household decision-making in Nepal (Rep. No. 526). Washington, DC: World Bank.
    1. Adato M., & Hoddinott J. (Eds.). (2010). Conditional cash transfers in the second decade: Current debates and new frontiers In Conditional cash transfers in Latin America (pp. 351–371). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
    1. Alkire S. (2005). Subjective quantitative studies of human agency. Social Indicators Research, 74, 217–260.
    1. Bastagli F., Hagen-Zanker J., Harman L., Barca V., Sturge G., & Schmidt T. (2016). Cash transfers: What does the evidence say? A rigorous review of programme impact and the role of design and implementation features. London: Overseas Development Institute.