Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;23(9):1177-1186.
doi: 10.1007/s10995-019-02748-x.

On the Stability of Reported Pregnancy Intentions from Pregnancy to 1 Year Postnatally: Impact of Choice of Measure, Timing of Assessment, Women's Characteristics and Outcome of Pregnancy

J A Hall  1 , J Stephenson  2 , G Barrett  2
Affiliations

On the Stability of Reported Pregnancy Intentions from Pregnancy to 1 Year Postnatally: Impact of Choice of Measure, Timing of Assessment, Women's Characteristics and Outcome of Pregnancy

J A Hall et al. Matern Child Health J. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: Retrospective, cross-sectional estimates of pregnancy intention, as used in the Demographic Health Survey (DHS), are the global norm. The London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy (LMUP) is a newer, psychometrically validated measure which may be more reliable. This paper assesses the reliability of the LMUP and the DHS question over the first postnatal year and explores the effects of maternal characteristics or pregnancy outcome on reported pregnancy intention.

Methods: We compared the test-retest reliability of the LMUP (using the AC coefficient) and DHS question (using the weighted Kappa) over the first postnatal year using data from Malawian women. We investigated the effect of maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcome using t-tests, Chi squared or Fisher's exact tests, and calculated odds ratios to estimate effect size.

Results: The DHS question was associated with a statistically significant decrease in the prevalence of unplanned pregnancies from 1-to-12 months postnatally; the LMUP was not. The LMUP had moderate to substantial reliability (0.51-0.66); the DHS had moderate reliability (0.56-0.58). The LMUP's stability was not related to any of the factors examined; the stability of the DHS varied by marital status (p = 0.033), number of children (p = 0.048) and postnatal depression (p < 0.001). Both underestimated unintended pregnancy postnatally vis-à-vis the LMUP in pregnancy.

Conclusions for practice: The LMUP is a more reliable measure of pregnancy intention than the DHS in the first postnatal year and does not vary by maternal characteristics or pregnancy outcome. The LMUP should become the gold-standard for measuring pregnancy intention and should be collected in pregnancy or at the first postnatal opportunity.

Keywords: Demographic and Health Survey; London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy; Measurement; Pregnancy intention; Pregnancy outcome; Reliability; Stability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of recruitment and follow-up of women in the cohort
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Almaghaslah E, Rochat R, Farhat G. Validation of a pregnancy planning measure for Arabic-speaking women. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(10):e0185433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185433. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bachrach CA, Newcomer S. Intended pregnancies and unintended pregnancies: Distinct categories or opposite ends of a continuum? Family Planning Perspectives. 1999;31(5):251–252. doi: 10.2307/2991577. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bankole A, Westoff CF. The consistency and validity of reproductive attitudes: Evidence from Morocco. Journal of Biosocial Science. 1998;30(4):439–455. doi: 10.1017/S0021932098004398. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barrett G, Smith SC, Wellings K. Conceptualisation, development and evaluation of a measure of unplanned pregnancy. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2004;58:426–433. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.014787. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barrett G, Wellings K. What is a ‘planned’ pregnancy? Empirical data from a British study. Social Science and Medicine. 2002;55:545–557. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00187-3. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources