Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct;33(8):e22958.
doi: 10.1002/jcla.22958. Epub 2019 Jun 19.

Potential prognostic factors for predicting the chemotherapeutic outcomes and prognosis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Affiliations

Potential prognostic factors for predicting the chemotherapeutic outcomes and prognosis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Liqun Zhang et al. J Clin Lab Anal. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to explore whether pretreatment potential prognostic factors are related to chemotherapeutic outcomes and the prognosis of inpatients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) undergoing chemotherapy.

Materials and methods: Data from 71 patients with mCRC were analyzed retrospectively. The relationship between the potential prognostic factors before first-line chemotherapy and the clinicopathological characteristics and chemotherapy response of the patients was calculated using Fisher's exact test and the chi-square test. The prognostic factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. We analyzed the subgroups using the Mann-Whitney U test.

Results: Four factors were eventually used as prognostic factors, namely the albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR), the fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR), the prealbumin-to-globulin ratio (PGR), and the fibrinogen-to-prealbumin ratio (FPR); the cutoff values of the four potential prognostic factors were 1.40, 10.63, 5.44, and 18.49, respectively. The high AGR and PGR groups had a higher response rate than that of the low groups. Patients in the low FAR and FPR groups showed a higher objective response rate than the high FAR and FPR groups. Patients with low FPR were associated with a higher disease control rate than patients with high FPR. Higher progression-free survival (PFS) was observed in the high AGR and PGR and low FAR and FPR groups. The AGR, FAR, PGR, and FPR were considered reliable prognostic factors for PFS in a univariate analysis.

Conclusions: The prechemotherapy AGR, FAR, PGR, and FPR were good prognostic factors to predict the chemotherapy response and PFS in patients with mCRC.

Keywords: FAR; PGR; chemotherapy response; colorectal cancer; prealbumin; prealbumin to globulin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the albumin‐to‐globulin ratio (AGR), the lymphocyte‐to‐monocyte ratio (LMR), and the prealbumin‐to‐globulin ratio (PGR) (A), and the neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the fibrinogen‐to‐albumin ratio (FAR), the platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and the fibrinogen‐to‐prealbumin ratio (FPR) (B) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan‐Meier survival curve analysis of the relationship between the pretreatment albumin‐to‐globulin ratio (AGR) (A), the fibrinogen‐to‐albumin ratio (FAR) (B), the prealbumin‐to‐globulin ratio (PGR) (C), and the fibrinogen‐to‐prealbumin ratio (FPR) (D), and progression‐free survival (PFS)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pearson's correlation analysis for the linear relationship between the albumin‐to‐globulin ratio (AGR) (A), the fibrinogen‐to‐albumin ratio (FAR) (B), the prealbumin‐to‐globulin ratio (PGR) (C), and the fibrinogen‐to‐prealbumin ratio (FPR) (D), and progression‐free survival (PFS)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394‐424. - PubMed
    1. Zheng RS, Sun KX, Zhang SW, et al. Report of cancer epidemiology in China, 2015. Zhonghua zhong liu za zhi [Chin J Oncol]. 2019;41(1):19‐28. - PubMed
    1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646‐674. - PubMed
    1. Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature. 2002;420(6917):860‐867. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balkwill F, Mantovani A. Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow? Lancet (London, England). 2001;357(9255):539‐545. - PubMed