Successful Migration from Radioactive Irradiators to X-ray Irradiators in One of the Largest Medical Centers in the US
- PMID: 31219892
- DOI: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001095
Successful Migration from Radioactive Irradiators to X-ray Irradiators in One of the Largest Medical Centers in the US
Abstract
This paper summarizes about 9 years of effort by Mount Sinai to successfully migrate completely from radioactive irradiators to x-ray irradiators without compromising patient care or research studies. All the effort by Mount Sinai to permanently remove the risk of malicious use of radioactive materials as Radiological Dispersal Device or dirty bomb is reviewed. Due to the unique characteristics of the cesium chloride (CsCl) used in irradiators, it is especially susceptible to be used as a dirty bombs. Mount Sinai originally had four of such irradiators. To reduce and eventually remove the risk of malicious use of radioactive materials, Mount Sinai in New York City has taken several steps. One of such measures was to harden the radioactive irradiators to make the radioactive materials harder to be stolen for malicious purposes. By increasing the delay time, the local law enforcement agency (LLEA) will have more time to stop the intruder. Another measure taken was to implement enhanced security in facilities having radioactive materials. We collaborated with the National Nuclear Security Administration and used state-of-the-art security equipment such as Biometric Access Control and 24/7 video monitoring. In addition, a remote monitoring system with alarms was installed and connected to LLEA for constant monitoring and possible intervention, if necessary, in a timely manner. The other measure taken was to limit the number of people who have access to such radioactive materials. We adopted a single person operator method and reduced the number of people having access from 145 people to only a few people. The adoption of such measures has reduced the risk significantly; however, the best way to remove the permanent risk of these radioactive materials that may be used for a dirty bomb is to use alternative technology to replace these high-activity radioactive sources. In 2013, Mount Sinai purchased its first x-ray irradiator to investigate the feasibility of using x-ray irradiators instead of cesium irradiators for research purposes for cells and small mice. The results from comparison studies were promising, which led to the decision of permanent migration of all cesium irradiators to x-ray irradiators. As of January 2018, Mount Sinai successfully disposed all its Cs irradiators. At this time, Mount Sinai, as one of the largest health care institutions in NY with about 50,000 employees, has migrated completely to alternative technology and removed the risk of malicious use of radioactive materials permanently.
Similar articles
-
Deciding between an X-Ray and 137Cs Irradiator - It's not just about Energy Spectra.Radiat Res. 2019 Nov;192(5):493-506. doi: 10.1667/RR15395.1. Epub 2019 Sep 10. Radiat Res. 2019. PMID: 31502907
-
University of California Replacement of Cesium Irradiators with Alternative Technologies.Health Phys. 2020 Feb;118(2):209-214. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001160. Health Phys. 2020. PMID: 31869317
-
Replacement of 137Cs irradiators with x-ray irradiators.Health Phys. 2009 Feb;96(2 Suppl):S27-30. doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000334555.78657.bc. Health Phys. 2009. PMID: 19125053
-
Dirty bomb source term characterization and downwind dispersion: Review of experimental evidence.J Environ Radioact. 2023 Jul;263:107166. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2023.107166. Epub 2023 Apr 12. J Environ Radioact. 2023. PMID: 37059048 Review.
-
Surgical pathology in the 20th century at the Mount Sinai Hospital, New York.Semin Diagn Pathol. 2008 Aug;25(3):178-89. doi: 10.1053/j.semdp.2008.06.003. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2008. PMID: 19007103 Review.
Cited by
-
Modeling Cell Survival Fraction and Other Dose-Response Relationships for Immunodeficient C.B-17 SCID Mice Exposed to 320-kV X Rays.Dose Response. 2021 May 31;19(2):15593258211019887. doi: 10.1177/15593258211019887. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun. Dose Response. 2021. PMID: 34104124 Free PMC article.
-
Pathogen-reduction technology, good in more than one way for cellular blood components, is replacing irradiation.Transfus Apher Sci. 2025 Apr;64(2):104088. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2025.104088. Epub 2025 Feb 4. Transfus Apher Sci. 2025. PMID: 39947047 Review.
-
Generation of bone marrow chimeras using X-ray irradiation: comparison to cesium irradiation and use in immunotherapy.J Biol Methods. 2020 Feb 17;7(1):e125. doi: 10.14440/jbm.2020.314. eCollection 2020. J Biol Methods. 2020. PMID: 32206674 Free PMC article.
-
Comparable human reconstitution following Cesium-137 versus X-ray irradiation preconditioning in immunodeficient NOG mice.PLoS One. 2020 Oct 29;15(10):e0241375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241375. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33119684 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials