Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 20;14(6):e0217385.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217385. eCollection 2019.

The impact of fungicide treatments on yeast biota of Verdicchio and Montepulciano grape varieties

Affiliations

The impact of fungicide treatments on yeast biota of Verdicchio and Montepulciano grape varieties

Alice Agarbati et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Yeast species that colonize the surface of grape berries at harvest time play an important role during the winemaking process. In this study, the use of culturable microbial techniques permitted a quantitative and qualitative inventory of the different yeast species present on the grape berry surfaces of Montepulciano and Verdicchio varieties when treated with conventional and organic fungicides. The results show that the most widespread yeast species at harvest time were Aureobasidium pullulans and Hanseniaspora uvarum, which are considered normal resident species and independent of the grape varieties and treatments applied. Specific differences when comparing the grape varieties were observed in species and were detected at a lower frequency; Pichia spp. were prevalent in Verdicchio, whereas Lachancea thermotolerans and Zygoascus meyerae were found in Montepulciano. In both vineyards, the farming treatments improved the competitiveness of A. pullulans, which was probably due to its reduced susceptibility to treatments that improved the competition toward other fungi. In contrast, the fermenting yeast H. uvarum was negatively affected by fungicide treatments and showed a reduced presence if compared with untreated grapes. Organic treatments directly impacted the occurrence of Issachenkia terricola in Montepulciano grapes and Debaryomyces hansenii and Pichia membranifaciens in Verdicchio. Conversely, a negative effect of organic treatments was found toward Metschnikowia pulcherrima and Starmerella bacillaris. Overall, the data suggest that the yeast community colonizing the grape berry surface was influenced by both grape variety and farming treatments, which characterized the yeast biota of spontaneous must fermentation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Mean values (%) of the initial yeast community in Verdicchio and Montepulciano grapes.
Fig 2
Fig 2. The average percentages of yeast species detected in organic, conventional and non-treated samples of Verdicchio and Montepulciano grapes at harvest time.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Average percentages of yeast species detected in organic, conventional and non-treated samples of Verdicchio and Montepulciano samples after 7 days of fermentation.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Average percentages of yeast species detected in organic, conventional and non-treated samples of Verdicchio and Montepulciano samples after 15 days of fermentation.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Principal component analysis related to the yeast community of samples coming from Verdicchio (V) and Montepulciano (M) vineyards subjected to organic (O) and conventional (C) fungicide and non-treated (NT) treatments.
(a) The yeast community on the grape surface detected at harvest time; (b) the yeast community of samples at 7 days of spontaneous fermentation; and (c) the yeast community of the samples at 15 days of spontaneous fermentation. A. pullulans (Ap); I. terricola (It); C. californica (Cc); Z. meyerae (Zm); Cryptococcus spp. (Cry); L. termotolerans (Lt); S. bacillaris (Sb); Rhodotorula spp. (Rh); M. pulcherrima (Mp); H. uvarum (Hu); D. hansenii (Dh); Z. bailii (Zb); P. fermentans (Pf); P. sporocuriosa (Ps); P. membranifaciens (Pm); T. delbrueckii (Td); C. diversa (Cd); P. kudriavzevii (Pk); W. anomanuls (Wa); S. cerevisiae (Sc).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fleet GH, Prakitchaiwattana C, Beh AL, Heard G. The yeast ecology of wine grapes. Biodiversity and biotechnology of wine yeasts. Research Signpost, Kerala, India; 2002. 95, pp. 1–17.
    1. Barata A, González S, Malfeito-Ferreira M, Querol A, Loureiro V. Sour rot-damaged grapes are sources of wine spoilage yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res. 2008; 8(7), 1008–1017. 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00399.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goddard MR, Anfang N, Tang R, Gardner RC, Jun C. A distinct population of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in New Zealand: evidence for local dispersal by insects and human‐aided global dispersal in oak barrels. Environ Microbiol. 2010; 12(1), 63–73. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02035.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Francesca N, Canale DE, Settanni L, Moschetti G. Dissemination of wine‐related yeasts by migratory birds. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2012; 4(1), 105–112. 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00310.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stefanini I, Dapporto L, Legras JL, Calabretta A, Di Paola M, De Filippo C, et al. Role of social wasps in Saccharomyces cerevisiae ecology and evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012; 109(33), 13398–13403. 10.1073/pnas.1208362109 - DOI - PMC - PubMed