Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 20;14(6):e0218342.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218342. eCollection 2019.

A comprehensive scoping review to identify standards for the development of health information resources on the internet

Affiliations

A comprehensive scoping review to identify standards for the development of health information resources on the internet

Noha Abdel-Wahab et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Online health information, if evidence-based and unbiased, can improve patients' and caregivers' health knowledge and assist them in disease management and health care decision-making.

Objective: To identify standards for the development of health information resources on the internet for patients.

Methods: We searched in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for publications describing evaluation instruments for websites providing health information. Eligible instruments were identified by three independent reviewers and disagreements resolved by consensus. Items reported were extracted and categorized into seven domains (accuracy, completeness and comprehensiveness, technical elements, design and aesthetics, usability, accessibility, and readability) that were previously thought to be a minimum requirement for websites.

Results: One hundred eleven articles met inclusion criteria, reporting 92 evaluation instruments (1609 items). We found 74 unique items that we grouped into the seven domains. For the accuracy domain, one item evaluated information provided in concordance with current guidelines. For completeness and comprehensiveness, 18 items described the disease with respect to various topics such as etiology or therapy, among others. For technical elements, 27 items evaluated disclosure of authorship, sponsorship, affiliation, editorial process, feedback process, privacy, and data protection. For design and aesthetics, 10 items evaluated consistent layout and relevant graphics and images. For usability, 10 items evaluated ease of navigation and functionality of internal search engines. For accessibility, five items evaluated the availability of websites to people with audiovisual disabilities. For readability, three items evaluated conversational writing style and use of a readability tool to determine the reading level of the text.

Conclusion: We identified standards for the development of online patient health information. This proposed instrument can serve as a guideline to develop and improve how health information is presented on the internet.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Basnet S, Dhital R, Tharu B. Acute Tubulointerstitial Nephritis: A Case Report on Rare Adverse Effect of Pembrolizumab. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019;55(5):21 10.3390/medicina55050176 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor—Let the reader and viewer beware. Jama. 1997;277(15):1244–5. Epub 1997/04/16. . - PubMed
    1. Fox S, Duggan M. Health online 2013: Pew Research Center 2013 [October 10, 2016]. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media/Files/Reports/PIP_HealthOnlin....
    1. Hesse BW, Nelson DE, Kreps GL, Croyle RT, Arora NK, Rimer BK, et al. Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey. Archives of internal medicine. 2005;165(22):2618–24. Epub 2005/12/14. 10.1001/archinte.165.22.2618 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Diaz JA, Sciamanna CN, Evangelou E, Stamp MJ, Ferguson T. Brief report: What types of Internet guidance do patients want from their physicians? Journal of general internal medicine. 2005;20(8):683–5. Epub 2005/07/30. 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0115.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types