Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 20;14(6):e0218667.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218667. eCollection 2019.

Optic nerve regeneration in larval zebrafish exhibits spontaneous capacity for retinotopic but not tectum specific axon targeting

Affiliations

Optic nerve regeneration in larval zebrafish exhibits spontaneous capacity for retinotopic but not tectum specific axon targeting

Beth M Harvey et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

In contrast to mammals, retinal ganglion cells (RGC) axons of the optic nerve even in mature zebrafish exhibit a remarkable capacity for spontaneous regeneration. One constraint of using adult zebrafish is the limited ability to visualize the regeneration process in live animals. To dynamically visualize and trace the degree of target specific optic nerve regeneration, we took advantage of the optical transparency still preserved in post developmental larval zebrafish. We developed a rapid and robust assay to physically transect the larval optic nerve and find that by 96 hours post injury RGC axons have robustly regrown onto the optic tectum. We observe functional regeneration by 8 days post injury, and demonstrate that similar to adult zebrafish, optic nerve transection in larval zebrafish does not prominently induce cell death or proliferation of RGC neurons. Furthermore, we find that partial optic nerve transection results in axonal growth predominantly to the original, contralateral tectum, while complete transection results in innervation of both the correct contralateral and 'incorrect' ipsilateral tectum. Axonal tracing reveals that although regenerating axons innervate the 'incorrect' ipsilateral tectum, they successfully target their topographically appropriate synaptic areas. Combined, our results validate post developmental larval zebrafish as a powerful model for optic nerve regeneration, and reveal intricate mechanistic differences between axonal growth, midline guidance and synaptic targeting during zebrafish optic nerve regeneration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Regeneration of RGC axons in larval zebrafish.
(A) Timeline of optic nerve regeneration. (B) Diagram of a Tg(isl2b:GFP) larva expressing GFP in RGCs and their axons. At 5dpf, optic nerves are transected with a sharpened tungsten needle proximal to the chiasm (black arrowheads). (C-D) Before injury, RGC axons cross the midline at the optic chiasm and innervate the contralateral tecta. Dashed lines indicate the outline of the eyes; scale bars = 50 μm. (E-F) Axonal growth from transected nerve at 16hpt is undetectable, while the portion of the nerve distal to the injury degenerates. (G-H) At 24 hpt, regrowing RGC axons begin to emerge from the proximal portion of the injured nerve (white arrowheads), while further degeneration continues. (I-J) By 48 hpt, regenerating axons project into the chiasm and re-innervate the tecta, though about 50% of transected nerves exhibit some misguided axonal growth (n = 81/160 nerves from 80 larvae, white arrows). (K-L) At 72 hpt, there is additional axonal growth to the tecta. (M-N) By 96 hpt, the axons within the chiasm fasciculate and robustly innervate the tecta (n = 160/160 nerves from 80 larvae). Representative images of chiasms and tecta for each timepoint are of the same fixed larva, though across timepoints are different larvae.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Optic nerve regeneration occurs in absence of significant RGC apoptosis or proliferation.
(A-F) Transverse optical sections of retinas from Tg(isl2b:GFP) uninjured larvae (A-C; n = 8 retinas) or larvae with transected optic nerves (D-E; n = 8 retinas) at 8 hpt labeled with anti-active caspase-3 (magenta). Following optic nerve injury, very few RGCs co-label with caspase-3 (E-F inset; see Table 1). (G-L) Transverse sections of retinas from Tg(isl2b:GFP) uninjured larvae (G-I; n = 10 retinas from 5 larvae) or larvae with transected optic nerves (J-L; n = 14 retinas from 7 larvae) at 24 hpt labeled with anti-PCNA (magenta) show no apparent PCNA staining in the inner nuclear layer. Scale bars = 50 μm.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Functional regeneration of RGC axons.
(A) Diagram illustrating the O-bend response elicited by suddenly extinguishing light (dark flash). (B) Timeline of events for testing functional regeneration. Tg(isl2b:GFP) larvae were uninjured or had the left optic nerve (ON) transected. O-bend responses to dark flashes were recorded prior to injuries at 0 dpt and then 1 dpt. At 7 dpt, the right ON was injured in larvae that originally received a left ON injury. A final assay for O-bend responses was performed at 8 dpt. (C) O-bend direction biases before (pre-injury; uninjured n = 18 larvae; left ON injured n = 83 larvae), after initial injuries were performed (1 dpt; uninjured n = 18 larvae; left ON injured n = 57 larvae), and after regeneration (8 dpt; uninjured n = 12 larvae; left ON injured n = 27 larvae). Before injuries, larvae perform O-bends with no directional bias. Larvae with a left ON injury at 1 dpt perform O-bends with a strong leftward directional bias, and by 8 dpt show no directional bias similar to uninjured larvae. ****p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon signed rank test; n.s., Mann-Whitney test.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Transected RGC axons grow to ipsilateral and contralateral tecta.
(A-L) Examples of RGC axonal tracings of Tg(isl2b:GFP) larvae at 72 hpt that were uninjured (A-D), received only a left optic nerve (ON) transection (E-H) or had both ON transected (I-L). Axons were traced by injecting the lipophilic dyes DiI and DiD into the left and right retina, respectively. RGC axons of uninjured nerves project to only contralateral tecta, while transected RGC axons grow to both ipsilateral and contralateral tecta. Asterisks indicate melanophores on the skin. Dashed lines outline dye fluorescence from the injected eye. Scale bar = 50 μm.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Partially injured RGC axons grow predominantly to contralateral tecta.
(A) At 0 dpt, Tg(isl2b:GFP) larvae with the right eye removed received optic nerve transections ranging in severity from completely transected (n = 17 larvae), partially transected (Category 1, n = 8; Category 2, n = 9; Category 3, n = 8) to uninjured (n = 16). The extent of the transections was assessed at 24 hpt and regeneration to the tecta was examined at 72 hpt. Red dashed boxes indicate the imaged tectal areas. (B-F) Decreasing the severity of the transection spares more intact axons in the tectum at 24 hpt as shown by the GFP expression of RGC axons. (G) Quantification of the intensity of GFP signal in the right tectum at 24hpt. Red data points indicate the larvae represented in (B-F) images. (H-L) Reducing the severity of the injury reduces inappropriate growth to the ipsilateral tectum. Scale bar = 50 μm.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Regenerating RGC axons terminate in correct topographic regions.
(A) At 72 hpt, small populations of RGCs were labeled by DiI and DiD injections into anterior and posterior, or dorsal and ventral quadrants of the left retinas of Tg(isl2b:GFP) that were uninjured or received left optic nerve (ON) transection. The right eye was removed to facilitate analysis. (B-Q) Following optic nerve transection, RGC axons project to both the ‘incorrect’ ipsilateral and contralateral tecta yet maintain the same correct topographic specificity as uninjured RGCs; (B-I) anterior RGCs to posterior tectum and posterior RGCs to anterior tectum (uninjured, n = 22 nerves from 22 larvae; left ON transected, n = 21 nerves from 21 larvae), as well as dorsal RGCs to ventral tectum and ventral RGCs to dorsal tectum (uninjured, n = 23 nerves from 23 larvae; left ON transected, n = 16 nerves from 16 larvae). Dashed lines outline fluorescence from the injected eye. Scale bar = 50 μm.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Case LC, Tessier-Lavigne M. Regeneration of the adult central nervous system. Curr Biol CB. 2005. September 20;15(18):R749–753. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.09.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Silver J, Miller JH. Regeneration beyond the glial scar. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004. February;5(2):146–56. 10.1038/nrn1326 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yiu G, He Z. Glial inhibition of CNS axon regeneration. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006. August;7(8):617–27. 10.1038/nrn1956 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fitch MT, Silver J. CNS injury, glial scars, and inflammation: Inhibitory extracellular matrices and regeneration failure. Exp Neurol. 2008. February;209(2):294–301. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2007.05.014 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benowitz LI, He Z, Goldberg JL. Reaching the brain: Advances in optic nerve regeneration. Exp Neurol. 2017. January;287(Pt 3):365–73. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.12.015 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources