Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;100(9):e02787.
doi: 10.1002/ecy.2787. Epub 2019 Jul 15.

A fast re-sampling method for using reliability ratings of sightings with extinction-date estimators

Affiliations

A fast re-sampling method for using reliability ratings of sightings with extinction-date estimators

Barry W Brook et al. Ecology. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

The pattern of sightings of a species that is rare, and then no longer observed, can be used to estimate its extinction date. However, other than physical captures or specimens, the veracity of any sighting is ambiguous, and should be treated probabilistically when used to infer extinction dates. We present a simple yet powerful computational approach for incorporating observational reliability into extinction date estimators (EDE). Our method (1) combines repeated within-year sightings probabilistically, (2) samples observations using reliability as an inclusion probability, (3) infers a probability distribution and summary statistics of extinction dates with any EDE, and (4) computes the frequency distribution of the extinction date. We applied this method to eight exemplar sighting records covering a range of lengths, sighting rates and uncertainties, using a variety of statistical EDEs, and compared these results with a threshold approach for selecting sightings. We also demonstrated a robust coverage of "true" extinction dates based on selected real-world examples of rediscovered species and confirmed extinctions, and simulated sighting records. Our approach represents a powerful generalization of past work because it is not predicated on any specific method for inferring extinction dates, and yet is simple to implement (with R script provided).

Keywords: computational ecology; extinction model; extinction time; sighting record; species persistence; uncertainty.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

Literature Cited

    1. Akçakaya, H. R., D. A. Keith, M. Burgman, S. H. M. Butchart, M. Hoffmann, H. M. Regan, I. Harrison, and E. Boakes. 2017. Inferring extinctions III: a cost-benefit framework for listing extinct species. Biological Conservation 214:336-342.
    1. Boakes, E. H., T. M. Rout, B. Collen, and D. Hodgson. 2015. Inferring species extinction: the use of sighting records. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6:678-687.
    1. Brook, B. W., S. R. Sleightholme, C. R. Campbell, and J. C. Buettel. 2018. Deficiencies in estimating the extinction date of the thylacine with mixed certainty data. Conservation Biology 32:1195-1197.
    1. Carlson, C. J., K. R. Burgio, T. A. Dallas, and A. L. Bond. 2018. Spatial extinction date estimation: a novel method for reconstructing spatiotemporal patterns of extinction and identifying potential zones of rediscovery. bioRxiv:279679. https://doi.org/279610.271101/279679
    1. Clements, C. 2013. sExtinct R Package. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sExtinct

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources