Dermoscopy and the experienced clinicians
- PMID: 31222814
- DOI: 10.1111/ijd.14512
Dermoscopy and the experienced clinicians
Abstract
For several decades, melanoma diagnosis was based on symptoms rather than clinical features. In fact, until the 1970s melanoma was widely not recognized and only diagnosed when presenting as a large, ulcerated, and bleeding nodule. Today it is well known that ulceration and bleeding are symptoms of an advanced stage; thus, it comes not as a surprise that the prognosis of melanoma at that time was very poor. This paper was developed to recognize dermoscopy as an integrative part of the clinical examination, bearing in mind that naked eye diagnosis can change after dermoscopy outcomes, and to help clinicians avoid the concept: "If in doubt, cut it out".
© 2019 The International Society of Dermatology.
References
-
- Diagnosis and treatment of early melanoma. NIH Consensus Development Conference. January 27-29, 1992. Consens Statement 1992; 10: 1-25.
-
- Kamińska-Winciorek G, Placek W. The most common mistakes on dermoscopy of melanocytic lesions. Postepy Dermatol Alergol 2015; 32: 33-39.
-
- Borsari S, Longo C, Piana S, et al. When the 'Ugly Duckling' Loses Brothers, It Becomes the 'Only Son of a Widowed Mother'. Dermatology 2015; 231: 222-223.
-
- Mascaro JM Jr, Mascaro JM. The dermatologist's position concerning nevi: a vision ranging from "the ugly duckling" to "little red riding hood". Arch Dermatol 1998; 134: 1484-1485.
-
- Grob JJ, Bonerandi JJ. The 'ugly duckling' sign: identification of the common characteristics of nevi in an individual as a basis for melanoma screening. Arch Dermatol 1998; 134: 103-104.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
