Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Sep;14(5):832-837.
doi: 10.1111/chd.12817. Epub 2019 Jun 21.

Three year experience of a clinical cardiovascular genetics program for infants with congenital heart disease

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Three year experience of a clinical cardiovascular genetics program for infants with congenital heart disease

Gabrielle C Geddes et al. Congenit Heart Dis. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To describe the first 3 years of experience of having an inpatient "cardiogenetics" program which involves medical geneticist assessment of infants with major congenital heart disease (CHD) requiring surgical intervention in the first year of life.

Patients: Patients less than a year of age admitted to Children's Hospital of Wisconsin's Herma Heart Institute for surgical intervention for CHD seen by the cardiogenetics program. Patients with major trisomies (13, 18, and 21) were excluded.

Outcome measures: Utilization and yield of genetic testing, and diagnostic rate were assessed as outcome measures and compared to a baseline time period and a genetic testing protocol time period.

Results: There were 201 infants with CHD evaluated by the cardiogenetics program over 3 years. A total of patients 46 patients of the 196 who underwent genetic testing had multiple tests completed. This is a significant decrease from the baseline (247/329, P < .0001) and from the genetic testing protocol (29/81, P < .0387) time periods. The diagnostic rate was 33% which is significantly increased compared to the baseline rate of 15% (80/524, P < .0001) and trends toward a significant increase during the testing protocol rate (25/113, P = .0520). The number of dual diagnosis increased to 9 of 201 compared to the baseline (2/524) and the genetic testing protocol (1/113) time periods. The rate of incidental diagnoses altering care increased to 6 of 201 from the baseline (1/524) and the genetic testing protocol (1/113) time periods.

Conclusion: An inpatient cardiogenetics program significantly increases the diagnostic rate, the detection of complex phenotypes with dual diagnoses, the identification of incidental genetic diagnoses associated with changes in care, and significantly decreases the likelihood of multiple tests being completed on an individual patient. Increased medical geneticist involvement in programs that care for infants with CHD should be encouraged to improve patient care and genetic testing utilization.

Keywords: cardiovascular genetics; congenital heart disease; genetic testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest or disclosures. This work had no direct funding. The clinical program described in this article is supported by Medical College of Wisconsin's Department of Pediatrics.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Volume of consults by quarter. Number of consults by quarter with a minimum of 9 and a maximum of 23 with a mean of 17. Number of surgeries completed on infants less than a year of age for congenital heart disease included for reference. The number of surgeries is an overestimate of the number of possible cardiovascular genetics consults due to inability to pull specifics on each patients to exclude those who would have been ineligible for consultation and multiple procedures performed on the same patient. On average 68% of the surgical volume underwent a cardiovascular genetic consultation; however, due to our volume data limitations the number of target patients who underwent consultation is actually higher

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Khairy P, Ionescu‐Ittu R, Mackie AS, Abrahamowicz M, Pilote L, Marelli AJ. Changing mortality in congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(14):1149‐1157. - PubMed
    1. Bouma BJ, Mulder BJ. Changing landscape of congenital heart disease. Circ Res. 2017;120(6):908‐922. - PubMed
    1. Geddes GC, Earing MG. Genetic evaluation of patients with congenital heart disease. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2018;30(6):707‐713. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pierpont ME, Brueckner M, Chung WK, et al. Genetic basis for congenital heart disease: revisited: a scientific statement from the american heart association. Circulation. 2018;138(21):e653‐e711. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ito S, Chapman KA, Kisling M, John AS. Appropriate use of genetic testing in congenital heart disease patients. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017;19(3):24. - PubMed

Publication types