Beyond the clinical team: evaluating the human factors-oriented training of non-clinical professionals working in healthcare contexts
- PMID: 31223489
- PMCID: PMC6567904
- DOI: 10.1186/s41077-019-0101-1
Beyond the clinical team: evaluating the human factors-oriented training of non-clinical professionals working in healthcare contexts
Abstract
Background: As clinical simulation has evolved, it is increasingly used to educate staff who work in healthcare contexts (e.g. hospital administrators) or frequently encounter clinical populations as part of their work (e.g. police officers) but are not healthcare professionals. This is in recognition of the important role such individuals play in the patients' experience of healthcare, frequently being a patients' first point of contact with health services. The aim of the training is to improve the ability of the team to communicate and co-ordinate their actions, but there is no validated instrument to evaluate the human factors learning of non-clinical staff. Our aim was to develop, pilot and evaluate an adapted version of the Human Factors Skills for Healthcare Instrument, for non-clinical professionals.
Method: The 18-item instrument was developed reflecting the human factors skills of situation awareness, decision making, communication, teamwork, leadership, care and compassion and stress and fatigue management. The instrument was piloted pre- and post-training with non-healthcare professionals (n = 188) attending mental health simulation training within an 11-month period (June 2017-April 2018). Trainees were hospital/primary care administrators (n = 53, 28%), police officers (n = 112, 59%), probation officers (n = 13, 7%) and social workers (n = 10, 5%). Most participants were female (n = 110, 59%) and from White ethnic backgrounds (n = 144, 77%).
Results: Six items were removed, five were not sufficiently sensitive to change (d < .3) and one showed poor reliability. The remaining 12 items revealed a Cronbach's alpha of .93. An exploratory factor analysis revealed a one-factor solution, which explained 58.3% of the variance. The final 12-item instrument was sensitive to change post-training (p < .0001) with large effect sizes (d > .7). Cluster analysis revealed that participants with lower pre-training scores showed the greatest improvement.
Discussion: The Human Factors Skills for Healthcare Instrument-Auxiliary version (HuFSHI-A) provides a reliable and valid instrument for the evaluation of human factors skills learning following training of non-clinical populations working in healthcare contexts. Although this instrument has been developed and evaluated with training courses specifically focusing on mental health topics, HuFSHI-A is applicable for any training where teamwork and co-ordination between clinical and non-clinical professionals is considered.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Development of the Human Factors Skills for Healthcare Instrument: a valid and reliable tool for assessing interprofessional learning across healthcare practice settings.BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2017 Oct;3(4):135-141. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2016-000159. Epub 2017 Jun 21. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2017. PMID: 29354278 Free PMC article.
-
Development of an instrument to measure awareness and mitigation of bias in maternal healthcare.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Apr;5(4):100872. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100872. Epub 2023 Jan 20. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023. PMID: 36682457
-
Conceptualizing Interprofessional Teams as Multi-Team Systems-Implications for Assessment and Training.Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(4):366-9. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1077136. Teach Learn Med. 2015. PMID: 26507993
-
American Medical Society for Sports Medicine position statement: concussion in sport.Br J Sports Med. 2013 Jan;47(1):15-26. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091941. Br J Sports Med. 2013. PMID: 23243113 Review.
-
Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 18;2(2):CD012876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012876.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 33599282 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Attitudes and Perceptions of Health Leaders for the Quality Enhancement of Workforce in Saudi Arabia.Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 12;10(5):891. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10050891. Healthcare (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35628028 Free PMC article.
-
TEAMs go VR-validating the TEAM in a virtual reality (VR) medical team training.Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 Sep 11;9(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s41077-024-00309-z. Adv Simul (Lond). 2024. PMID: 39261889 Free PMC article.
-
The use of simulation to prepare and improve responses to infectious disease outbreaks like COVID-19: practical tips and resources from Norway, Denmark, and the UK.Adv Simul (Lond). 2020 Apr 16;5:3. doi: 10.1186/s41077-020-00121-5. eCollection 2020. Adv Simul (Lond). 2020. PMID: 32308988 Free PMC article.
-
Health care provider's risk perception, and preparedness towards COVID-19 pandemic in North Central Ethiopia, 2020.Heliyon. 2021 Mar 29;7(3):e06610. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06610. eCollection 2021 Mar. Heliyon. 2021. PMID: 33869847 Free PMC article.
-
Letter to the Editor: "Human Patient Simulation: Educational Issues and Practical Implications in COVID-19 Times".World Neurosurg. 2020 Sep;141:570. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.178. Epub 2020 Jun 26. World Neurosurg. 2020. PMID: 32599212 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Lavelle Mary, Abthorpe Jennifer, Simpson Thomas, Reedy Gabriel, Little Fiona, Banerjee Anita. MBRRACE in simulation: an evaluation of a multi-disciplinary simulation training for medical emergencies in obstetrics (MEmO) Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2018;38(6):781–788. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1419339. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous