Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Jan;101(1):5-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.06.008. Epub 2019 Jun 19.

Comparing preoperative dating and postoperative dating for second-trimester surgical abortions

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparing preoperative dating and postoperative dating for second-trimester surgical abortions

Sameera Mokkarala et al. Contraception. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess relationships between preoperative and postoperative dating of second-trimester surgical abortion.

Study design: We used a deidentified institutional database to extract demographic, dating and pathology data for surgical abortions performed at 14 to 23-6/7 weeks' gestational age (GA) from 9/2015 to 5/2017. We excluded women with multiple gestations, fetal anomalies and missing fetal biometric measurements. We assigned preoperative GA by ultrasonography for unknown last menstrual period (LMP) or when discrepancy between sonographic and LMP dating exceeded 7 days (<15-6/7 weeks), 10 days (16 to 21-6/7 weeks) or 14 days (22 to 23-6/7 weeks). We determined postoperative GA using fetal foot length pathology standards published by Streeter in 1920 and Drey et al. in 2005. We performed regression analysis to estimate the relationship between pre- and postoperative estimates of GA and to assess demographic effects on these estimates, and χ2 tests to assess whether fetal foot lengths were concordant with, larger than or smaller than the expected range for the preoperative GA.

Results: The 469 patients analyzed had a median preoperative GA of 19-4/7 weeks (range 14-0/7 to 23-6/7 weeks). Preoperative dating highly correlated with postoperative dating using both pathology standards (r2=0.95, p<.001), without any clinically relevant effect by body mass index (Streeter and Drey, p=.79), parity (Streeter p=.89; Drey p=.71), race (Streeter p=.06; Drey p=.07) or GA. Fetal foot lengths were larger than expected in 134 (28.6%) women using Streeter and 17 (3.6%) women using Drey standards (p<.001).

Conclusions: Preoperative dating and postoperative dating for second-trimester surgical abortion highly correlate. Use of Streeter standards results in more women with a postoperative GA greater than expected compared to Drey standards.

Implications: Increasing legal gestational age restrictions have placed additional burden on clinicians providing safe abortions, but guidelines on gestational age determination are lacking. Contemporary pathology standards consistent with modern practice and universally accepted by abortion providers and gynecologic pathologists are critical to our goal of safe and legal abortion provision.

Keywords: Abortion; Fetal foot length; Gestational age; Postnatal foot length; Pregnancy; Ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Scatterplot comparing gestational age by preoperative and postoperative assessments in women undergoing second-trimester surgical abortion.(A) Streeter pathology standards [7].(B) Drey pathology standards [8].Fetal age by preoperative gestational age (weeks) versus postoperative gestational age (weeks), R2=0.95, p<.001 for both graphs. Preoperative gestational age was based on LMP or sonographic dating in cases of unknown LMP or when the discrepancy between sonographic and LMP dating exceeded 7 days (<15-6/7 weeks’ GA), 10 days (16 to 21-6/7 weeks’ GA) or 14 days (22 to 23-6/7 weeks’ GA) [5].

Similar articles

References

    1. Frick AC, Drey EA, Diedrich JT, Steinauer JE. Effect of prior cesarean delivery on risk of second-trimester surgical abortion complications. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:760–4. - PubMed
    1. Peterson WF, Berry FN, Grace MR, Gulbranson CL. Second-trimester abortion by dilatation and evacuation: an analysis of 11,747 cases. Obstet Gynecol 1983;62:185–90. - PubMed
    1. Berer M. Abortion law and policy around the world: in search of decriminalization. Health Hum Rights 2017;19:13–27. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taipale P, Hiilesmaa V. Predicting delivery date by ultrasound and last menstrual period in early gestation. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:189–94. - PubMed
    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee opinion no 700: methods for estimating the due date. Obstet Gynecol 2017;129:e150–4. - PubMed

Publication types