Comparing preoperative dating and postoperative dating for second-trimester surgical abortions
- PMID: 31226319
- PMCID: PMC10075327
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.06.008
Comparing preoperative dating and postoperative dating for second-trimester surgical abortions
Abstract
Objectives: To assess relationships between preoperative and postoperative dating of second-trimester surgical abortion.
Study design: We used a deidentified institutional database to extract demographic, dating and pathology data for surgical abortions performed at 14 to 23-6/7 weeks' gestational age (GA) from 9/2015 to 5/2017. We excluded women with multiple gestations, fetal anomalies and missing fetal biometric measurements. We assigned preoperative GA by ultrasonography for unknown last menstrual period (LMP) or when discrepancy between sonographic and LMP dating exceeded 7 days (<15-6/7 weeks), 10 days (16 to 21-6/7 weeks) or 14 days (22 to 23-6/7 weeks). We determined postoperative GA using fetal foot length pathology standards published by Streeter in 1920 and Drey et al. in 2005. We performed regression analysis to estimate the relationship between pre- and postoperative estimates of GA and to assess demographic effects on these estimates, and χ2 tests to assess whether fetal foot lengths were concordant with, larger than or smaller than the expected range for the preoperative GA.
Results: The 469 patients analyzed had a median preoperative GA of 19-4/7 weeks (range 14-0/7 to 23-6/7 weeks). Preoperative dating highly correlated with postoperative dating using both pathology standards (r2=0.95, p<.001), without any clinically relevant effect by body mass index (Streeter and Drey, p=.79), parity (Streeter p=.89; Drey p=.71), race (Streeter p=.06; Drey p=.07) or GA. Fetal foot lengths were larger than expected in 134 (28.6%) women using Streeter and 17 (3.6%) women using Drey standards (p<.001).
Conclusions: Preoperative dating and postoperative dating for second-trimester surgical abortion highly correlate. Use of Streeter standards results in more women with a postoperative GA greater than expected compared to Drey standards.
Implications: Increasing legal gestational age restrictions have placed additional burden on clinicians providing safe abortions, but guidelines on gestational age determination are lacking. Contemporary pathology standards consistent with modern practice and universally accepted by abortion providers and gynecologic pathologists are critical to our goal of safe and legal abortion provision.
Keywords: Abortion; Fetal foot length; Gestational age; Postnatal foot length; Pregnancy; Ultrasound.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Updating fetal foot length to gestational age references: a chart review of abortion cases from 2012 to 2014.Contraception. 2020 Jan;101(1):10-13. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Jul 11. Contraception. 2020. PMID: 31302119
-
Improving the accuracy of fetal foot length to confirm gestational duration.Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;105(4):773-8. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000154159.75022.11. Obstet Gynecol. 2005. PMID: 15802404
-
International standards for early fetal size and pregnancy dating based on ultrasound measurement of crown-rump length in the first trimester of pregnancy.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;44(6):641-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.13448. Epub 2014 Nov 2. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 25044000 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Should a first trimester dating scan be routine for all pregnancies?Semin Perinatol. 2013 Oct;37(5):307-9. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2013.06.006. Semin Perinatol. 2013. PMID: 24176152 Review.
-
Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of postnatal clinical scoring methods and foot length measurement for estimating gestational age and birthweight of newborns in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024 Aug 30;8(1):e002717. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002717. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024. PMID: 39214548 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Frick AC, Drey EA, Diedrich JT, Steinauer JE. Effect of prior cesarean delivery on risk of second-trimester surgical abortion complications. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:760–4. - PubMed
-
- Peterson WF, Berry FN, Grace MR, Gulbranson CL. Second-trimester abortion by dilatation and evacuation: an analysis of 11,747 cases. Obstet Gynecol 1983;62:185–90. - PubMed
-
- Taipale P, Hiilesmaa V. Predicting delivery date by ultrasound and last menstrual period in early gestation. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:189–94. - PubMed
-
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee opinion no 700: methods for estimating the due date. Obstet Gynecol 2017;129:e150–4. - PubMed