Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 21;15(1):209.
doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-1957-y.

Reproductive toxicity of fluoroquinolones in birds

Affiliations

Reproductive toxicity of fluoroquinolones in birds

Hana Hruba et al. BMC Vet Res. .

Abstract

Background: While commercial poultry and captive birds are exposed to antimicrobials through direct medication, environmental pollution may result in contamination of wild birds. Fluoroquinolones are commonly used medications to treat severe avian bacterial infections; however, their adverse effects on birds remain understudied. Here, we examine toxicity of enrofloxacin and marbofloxacin during the egg incubation period using the chicken (Gallus Gallus domesticus) as a model avian species. Laboratory tests were based on eggs injected with 1, 10 and 100 μg of fluoroquinolones per 1 g of egg weight prior to the start of incubation and monitoring of chick blood biochemistry, reproductive parameters and heart rate during incubation.

Results: Eggs treated with fluoroquinolones displayed reduced hatchability due to embryonic mortality, particularly on day 13 of incubation. Total hatching success showed a similar pattern, with a significantly reduced hatchability in low and high exposure groups treated with both enrofloxacin and marbofloxacin. From 15 to 67% of chicks hatching in these groups exhibited joint deformities. Hatching one-day pre-term occurred with a prevalence of 31 to 70% in all groups treated with fluoroquinolones. Embryonic heart rate, measured on days 13 and 19 of incubation, increased in all enrofloxacin-treated groups and medium and high dose groups of marbofloxacin-treated eggs. Blood biochemistry of chicks sampled at hatch from medium dose groups showed hypoproteinaemia, decreased uric acid and increased triglycerides. Chicks from the enrofloxacin-treated group displayed mild hyperglycaemia and a two-fold rise in the blood urea nitrogen to uric acid ratio. Principal components analysis based on blood biochemistry clearly separated the control bird cluster from both enrofloxacin- and marbofloxacin-treated birds.

Conclusions: Fluoroquinolones induce complex adverse effects on avian embryonic development, considerably reducing the performance of incubated eggs and hatching chicks. Cardiotoxicity, which quickens embryonic heart rate, meant that the total number of heart beats required for embryogenesis was achieved earlier than in the standard incubation period, resulting in pre-term hatching. Our data suggest that enrofloxacin has a higher potential for adverse effects than marbofloxacin. To conclude, care should be taken to prevent exposure of reproducing birds and their eggs to fluoroquinolones.

Keywords: Antibiotics; Avian embryonic heart rate; Enrofloxacin; Hatchability; Marbofloxacin; Pre-term hatching; Reproduction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Chicken embryonic heart rate following exposure to fluoroquinolones - day 13 of incubation. Groups: C1 = untreated control, C2 = sham-treated control eggs (aqua pro injectione); E1, E2, E3 = groups exposed to 1, 10 and 100 μg of enrofloxacin per 1 g of egg weight, respectively; M1, M2, M3 = groups exposed to 1, 10 and 100 μg of marbofloxacin per 1 g of egg weight, respectively; * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01 (when compared against control group C1 or C2), n = 26 for each control group and 20 for each exposure group
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Chicken embryonic heart rate following exposure to fluoroquinolones - day 19 of incubation. Groups: C1 = untreated control, C2 = sham-treated control eggs (aqua pro injectione); E1, E2, E3 = groups exposed to 1, 10 and 100 μg of enrofloxacin per 1 g of egg weight, respectively; M1, M2, M3 = groups exposed to 1, 10 and 100 μg of marbofloxacin per 1 g of egg weight, respectively; * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01 (when compared against control group C1 or C2), n = 26 for each control group and 20 for each exposure group
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Component score (a) and component weight (b) plots from principal component analysis of selected blood biochemistry parameters. Chick blood samples were obtained on the day of hatching. The cluster of control birds is well separated from all fluoroquinolone-treated birds and the first two components combined explain 68.96% of variation observed. Group labels: C = control birds (data for chicks hatching from untreated and sham-treated control eggs grouped); E2, M2 = birds exposed to fluoroquinolone enrofloxacin (E2 = 10 μg of enrofloxacin per 1 g of egg weight) and marbofloxacin (M2 = 10 μg of marbofloxacin per 1 g of egg weight). Abbreviations: TPRO = total protein, GLU = glucose, UA = uric acid, TG = triglycerides, IP = inorganic phosphorus

References

    1. Havelkova B, Beklova M, Kovacova V, Hlavkova D, Pikula J. Ecotoxicity of selected antibiotics for organisms of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Neuroendocrinol Lett. 2016;37(Suppl 1):38–44. - PubMed
    1. Sarmah AK, Meyer MT, Boxall AB. A global perspective on the use, sales, exposure pathways, occurrence, fate and effects of veterinary antibiotics (VAs) in the environment. Chemosphere. 2006;65:725–759. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.03.026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sukul P, Spiteller M. Fluoroquinolone antibiotics in the environment. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2007;191:131–162. - PubMed
    1. Van Bambeke F, Michot JM, Van Eldere J, Tulkens PM. Quinolones in 2005: an update. Clin Microbiol Infec. 2005;11:256–280. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01131.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brown SA. Fluoroquinolones in animal health. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 1996;19:1–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1996.tb00001.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources