Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 22;9(6):e024950.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024950.

Using the theoretical domains framework and the behavioural change wheel in an overarching synthesis of systematic reviews

Michelle Richardson  1 , Claire Louise Khouja  2 , Katy Sutcliffe  1 , James Thomas  1
Affiliations

Using the theoretical domains framework and the behavioural change wheel in an overarching synthesis of systematic reviews

Michelle Richardson et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: Synthesis that can filter the evidence from multiple sources to inform the choice of intervention components is highly desirable yet, at present, there are few examples of systematic reviews that explicitly define this type of synthesis using behaviour change frameworks. Here, we demonstrate how using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) made it possible to bring together the findings from a series of three interconnected systematic reviews on the self-care of minor ailments (MAs) to inform the choice of intervention components.

Method: The TDF and the capability, opportunity, motivation model of behaviour at the hub of the BCW were used to synthesise the findings from the three reviews, including syntheses of service-user views in interviews (review 1, 20 studies) and surveys (review 2, 13 studies), and evaluations of a range of interventions and services (review 3, 21 studies).

Results: The TDF and BCW approach provided a systematic, structured and replicable methodology for retrospectively integrating different types of evidence within a series of systematic reviews. Several intervention strategies, grounded in theory and discussed with key stakeholders, were suggested, which can be implemented and tested.

Conclusions: This novel application of the TDF/BCW approach illustrates how it can be used to bring together quantitative and qualitative evidence to better understand self-care behaviour for MAs within a systematic review context. The TDF/BCW approach facilitated exploration of the contradictions and gaps between the separate review syntheses, and supported the identification of possible intervention strategies, grounded in theory. The ongoing development and refinement of this method is supported.

Prospero registration number: CRD42017071515.

Keywords: behaviour change wheel; minor ailments; mixed methods; public health; self-care; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Behaviour Change Wheel
Figure 2
Figure 2
The capability, opportunity, motivation model of behaviour (COM-B) with salient theoretical domains for the self-care of minor ailments
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ 2010;341:c4587 10.1136/bmj.c4587 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oliver SR, Rees RW, Clarke-Jones L, et al. . A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research. Health Expect 2008;11:72–84. 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00476.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Richardson M, Khouja C, Sutcliffe K, et al. . Self-care for minor ailments: systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative research. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, 2018. ISBN: 978-1-911605-04-1.
    1. Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, et al. . Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:26–33. 10.1136/qshc.2004.011155 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci 2011;6:42 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types