Thoracic kyphosis assessment in postmenopausal women: an examination of the Flexicurve method in comparison to radiological methods
- PMID: 31230111
- DOI: 10.1007/s00198-019-05023-5
Thoracic kyphosis assessment in postmenopausal women: an examination of the Flexicurve method in comparison to radiological methods
Abstract
The Flexicurve ruler is an alternative method to radiographs for measuring thoracic kyphosis (curvature), but it is not certain that it is comparable. This study shows that Flexicurve can estimate radiographic vertebral centroid angles with less error than Cobb angles but that its accuracy would be inadequate for most clinical purposes.
Introduction: The Flexicurve ruler provides a non-radiological method of measuring thoracic kyphosis (TK) that has moderately strong correlations with the gold-standard radiographic Cobb angle method, while consistently underestimating the TK angle. Cobb angles can include measurement errors that may contribute to poor agreement, particularly in older populations. The vertebral centroid angle could be a better radiographic reference method for the validation of Flexicurve. Using two separate radiographic measurements of TK, we examined the validity of Flexicurve. We aimed to ascertain the level of agreement between measures and to empirically explore reasons for between-method differences.
Methods: TK angles determined using Flexicurve and radiographic Cobb and vertebral centroid methods were compared using data from 117 healthy postmenopausal women (mean (SD) age 61.4 (7.0) years). Bland and Altman plots were used to assess differences between methods. Age, bone mineral density and body mass index were examined as characteristics that might explain any differences.
Results: Flexicurve angles were scaled prior to analysis. There was no statistically significant difference between angles produced by Flexicurve and vertebral centroid methods (MD - 2.16°, 95%CI - 4.35° to 0.03°) although differences increased proportionally with TK angles. Flexicurve angles were significantly smaller than radiographic Cobb angles and depending on the scaling method used, systematic error ranged between - 2.48° and - 5.19°. Age accounts for some of the differences observed (R2 < 0.08, p < 0.005).
Conclusions: TK measured using the Flexicurve shows better agreement with the radiographic vertebral centroid method, but inaccuracy of the Flexicurve increases with increasing angle of kyphosis.
Keywords: Flexicurve method; Postmenopausal women; Thoracic kyphosis.
Similar articles
-
Validation of the manual inclinometer and flexicurve for the measurement of thoracic kyphosis.Physiother Theory Pract. 2018 Apr;34(4):301-308. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2017.1394411. Epub 2017 Nov 7. Physiother Theory Pract. 2018. PMID: 29111847
-
The reliability and validity of three non-radiological measures of thoracic kyphosis and their relations to the standing radiological Cobb angle.Osteoporos Int. 2011 Jun;22(6):1897-905. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1422-z. Epub 2010 Oct 12. Osteoporos Int. 2011. PMID: 20938766 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Radiographic measures of thoracic kyphosis in osteoporosis: Cobb and vertebral centroid angles.Skeletal Radiol. 2007 Aug;36(8):761-7. doi: 10.1007/s00256-007-0284-8. Epub 2007 Apr 12. Skeletal Radiol. 2007. PMID: 17437103 Clinical Trial.
-
The relationship between thoracic kyphosis and age, and normative values across age groups: a systematic review of healthy adults.J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jul 9;16(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02592-2. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021. PMID: 34243795 Free PMC article.
-
Age-related hyperkyphosis: its causes, consequences, and management.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Jun;40(6):352-60. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3099. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010. PMID: 20511692 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Is Breast Size Related to Prevalent Thoracic Vertebral Fracture? A Cross-Sectional Study.JBMR Plus. 2020 May 19;4(7):e10371. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10371. eCollection 2020 Jul. JBMR Plus. 2020. PMID: 32666022 Free PMC article.
-
Reliability of the Smartphone Application Inclinometer and Flexicurve in Measuring Thoracic Kyphosis.Cureus. 2023 Mar 8;15(3):e35886. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35886. eCollection 2023 Mar. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37033529 Free PMC article.
-
Validity, reliability, and clinical usefulness of instruments for measuring thoracic kyphosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Braz J Phys Ther. 2025 Aug 7;29(5):101246. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101246. Online ahead of print. Braz J Phys Ther. 2025. PMID: 40780025 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Fon GT, Pitt MJ, Thies AC Jr (1980) Thoracic kyphosis: range in normal subjects. Am J Roentgenol 134(5):979–983. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.134.5.979 - DOI
-
- Milne JS, Williamson J (1983) A longitudinal study of kyphosis in older people. Age Ageing 12(3):225–233 - DOI
-
- Puche RC, Morosano M, Masoni A, Jimeno NP, Bertoluzzo SM, Podadera JC, Podadera MA, Bocanera R, Tozzini R (1995) The natural history of kyphosis in postmenopausal women. Bone 17(3):239–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(95)00212-v - DOI - PubMed
-
- Greendale GA, Nili NS, Huang MH, Seeger L, Karlamangla AS (2011) The reliability and validity of three non-radiological measures of thoracic kyphosis and their relations to the standing radiological cobb angle. Osteoporos Int 22(6):1897–1905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1422-z - DOI - PubMed
-
- Fortin C, Feldman DE, Cheriet F, Labelle H (2011) Clinical methods for quantifying body segment posture: a literature review. Disabil Rehabil 33(5):367–383. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2010.492066 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical