Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 May 17:4:32.
doi: 10.21037/tgh.2019.04.09. eCollection 2019.

Treatment of pancreatic cancer-neoadjuvant treatment in borderline resectable/locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Affiliations
Review

Treatment of pancreatic cancer-neoadjuvant treatment in borderline resectable/locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Florian Scheufele et al. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. .

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is currently ranked fourth place of cancer related mortality. Only a minority of 10-20% of patients with PDAC have a primarily resectable disease, while 50-60% of the patients are diagnosed with irresectable disease. A certain group of patients is defined as "borderline resectable", which is mainly relied to contact of the tumor to major abdominal vessels. For preoperative evaluation of resectability CT and MRI is commonly used. Although CT-scanning, which is the standard preoperative imaging modality, has striking limitations concerning evaluation of lymph node status as well as vessel involvement and approximately 20% of the patients are staged incorrectly. A central part of modern therapy of locally advanced or not primarily resectable PDAC is neoadjuvant therapy. Especially neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to the FOLFIRINOX protocol resulted in high resection rates of initially not resectable patients. Furthermore, treatment with FOLFIRINOX was shown to be an independent predictor of improved prognosis and resection after neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX was associated with improved survival. Neoadjuvant treatment was able to increases the rates of R0 resection, which depicts an independent prognostic factor and FOLFIRINOX outmatched other treatment regimes (e.g., gemcitabine-based radio-chemotherapy) concerning achievement of a R0 resection. While most evidence of neoadjuvant treatment of PDAC is conferred by retrospective analysis, there is growing data from randomized controlled trials, confirming the beneficial effects of neoadjuvant therapy on the prognosis of PDAC. Thus, patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced PDAC should be evaluated for neoadjuvant treatment. If there is no progression of the disease during neoadjuvant treatment exploration with the goal of R0 resection should be performed. If possible, patients should be included in well-designed randomized controlled trials at specialized pancreatic centers.

Keywords: Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer; chemotherapy; ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas; neoadjuvant therapy; radio-chemotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Staging-CT of borderline resectable PDAC. Infiltration of the SMV (E,F), contact to the SMA (<90°) (C,D) and potential infiltration of the common hepatic artery (A,B). PDAC, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; SMV, superior mesenteric vein.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Venous resection of the SMV. The tumor invaded SMV segment is resected until the first major jejunal branches (A). Creation of a common ostium with the first jejunal branch and the distal end of the SMV, which is anastomosed to the proximal SMV (B). Situs after venous reconstruction (C). SMV, superior mesenteric vein.

References

    1. Koch-Institut Z.f.K.i.R. 2018; Available online: https://www.krebsdaten.de/Krebs/SiteGlobals/Forms/Datenbankabfrage/daten....
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:7-30. 10.3322/caac.21387 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Strobel O, Hank T, Hinz U, et al. Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: The New R-status Counts. Ann Surg 2017;265:565-73. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001731 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Demir IE, Jäger C, Schlitter AM, et al. R0 Versus R1 Resection Matters after Pancreaticoduodenectomy, and Less after Distal or Total Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer. Ann Surg 2018;268:1058-68. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002345 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Howard TJ, Krug JE, Yu J, et al. A margin-negative R0 resection accomplished with minimal postoperative complications is the surgeon's contribution to long-term survival in pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10:1338-45; discussion 1345-6. 10.1016/j.gassur.2006.09.008 - DOI - PubMed