Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun;98(25):e16140.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016140.

Comparison of internal fixation with Gamma3 Long nails and INTERTAN nails in the treatment of Seinsheimer type V subtrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients

Yan-Hui Li  1 , Dong Zhu  2 , Yuying Li  3 , Tianhao Zhao  2 , Zongbing Cao  2 , Lei Tan  2
Affiliations

Comparison of internal fixation with Gamma3 Long nails and INTERTAN nails in the treatment of Seinsheimer type V subtrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients

Yan-Hui Li et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to clinically compare the therapeutic effects of internal fixation using a third-generation Gamma Long Nail (TGLN) with that of INTERTAN in the treatment of Seinsheimer Type V subtrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients.The therapeutic effect of internal fixation with TGLN, compared with that with INTERTAN, was retrospectively analyzed in elderly patients diagnosed with Seinsheimer Type V subtrochanteric fracture. Twenty-five cases were divided into 2 groups based on the fixation devices: the TGLN group (13 cases; 5 men and 8 women) and the INTERTAN group (12 cases; 5 men and 7 women). Patients were followed up postoperatively, and their clinical history, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing, Harris Hip Scores, and postoperative complications were recorded and compared.Patients in the TGLN group had shorter operation time and less intraoperative blood loss, compared with those in the INTERTAN group (P < .05). There were no significant between-group differences in postoperative complications, fracture healing time and Harris Hip Scores during the follow-up (P > .05).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Fixation of Seinsheimer Type V subtrochanteric femoral fracture with a TGLN. Preoperative anteroposterior pelvis x-ray shows Seinsheimer Type V subtrochanteric fractures on the left proximal femur with significant displacement of the fracture ends (A). Postoperative anteroposterior and lateral view radiographs of the left femur demonstrated excellent fracture reduction and internal fixation in place (B, C).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Fixation of Seinsheimer Type V subtrochanteric femoral fracture with an INTERTAN device. The fracture (A) was reduced and fixed appropriately (B, C).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hoskins W, Bingham R, Joseph S, et al. Subtrochanteric fracture: the effect of cerclage wire on fracture reduction and outcome. Injury 2015;46:1992–5. - PubMed
    1. Huang SY, Grimsrud CD, Provus J, et al. The impact of subtrochanteric fracture criteria on hip fracture classification. Osteoporos Int 2012;23:743–50. - PubMed
    1. Vanderschot P, Vanderspeeten K, Verheyen L, et al. A review on 161 subtrochanteric fractures--risk factors influencing outcome: age, fracture pattern and fracture level. Unfallchirurg 1995;98:265–71. - PubMed
    1. Tarazona-Santabalbina FJ, Aguilella-Fernandez L. Bisphosphonate long-term treatment related bilateral subtrochanteric femoral fracture. Can teriparatide be useful? Aging Clin Exp Res 2013;25:605–9. - PubMed
    1. Pollock FH, Bethea A, Samanta D, et al. Readmission within 30 days of discharge after hip fracture care. Orthopedics 2015;38:e7–13. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms