Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 1;112(4):400-409.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz131.

Annual vs Biennial Screening: Diagnostic Accuracy Among Concurrent Cohorts Within the Ontario Breast Screening Program

Affiliations

Annual vs Biennial Screening: Diagnostic Accuracy Among Concurrent Cohorts Within the Ontario Breast Screening Program

Anna M Chiarelli et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. .

Abstract

Background: The Ontario Breast Screening Program recommends annual mammography to women age 50-74 years at increased risk because of family history of breast or ovarian cancer or personal history of ovarian cancer or mammographic density 75% or greater. Few studies have examined the diagnostic accuracy of recommendations based on risk factors and included screen film as well as digital mammography.

Methods: A retrospective design identified concurrent cohorts of women age 50-74 years screened annually or biennially with digital mammography only between 2011 and 2014 and followed until 2016 or breast cancer diagnosis. Diagnostic accuracy measures were compared between women screened annually because of first-degree relative of breast or ovarian cancer or personal history of ovarian cancer (n = 67 795 women), mammographic density 75% or greater (n = 51 956), or both (n = 3758) and those screened biennially (n = 526 815). The association between recommendation and sensitivity and specificity was assessed using generalized estimating equation models. All P values are two-sided.

Results: For annual screening because of family or personal history vs biennial, sensitivity was statistically significantly higher (81.7% vs 70.6%; OR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.48 to 2.34), particularly for invasive cancers and postmenopausal women. Although there was no statistically significant difference in sensitivity for annual screening for mammographic density 75% or greater, specificity was statistically significantly lower (91.3%; OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.80 to 0.96) vs biennial (92.3%), particularly for women age 50-59 years.

Conclusion: Compared with biennial screening, annual screening improved detection for women with a family or personal history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, supporting screening that is more frequent. The benefit for annual screening for women with higher mammographic density must be weighed against possible harms of increased false positives.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mammographic screening examinations among women age 50–74 years in the Ontario Breast Screening Program (OBSP) between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2014, by screening recommendation. *Includes screens with final result and where index screen is between 11 months and 5 years from previous screen. †Excludes screens among women whose screening recommendation changed between their previous and index screen (family history n = 14 846; mammographic density n = 28 675; family history and mammographic density n = 7039; biennial n = 30 681). ‡Two or more first-degree female relatives with breast cancer at any age, one first-degree female relative with breast cancer younger than 50 years, one first-degree male relative with breast cancer at any age, a personal history of ovarian cancer, or one first-degree female relative with ovarian cancer at any age.

References

    1. Gilliland FD, Joste N, Stauber PM, et al. Biologic characteristics of interval and screen-detected breast cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(9):743–749. - PubMed
    1. Chiarelli AM, Edwards SA, Sheppard AJ, et al. Favourable prognostic factors of subsequent screen-detected breast cancers among women aged 50–69. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2012;21(6):499–506. - PubMed
    1. Cowan WK, Angus B, Gray JC, Lunt LG, Al-Tamimi SR.. A study of interval breast cancer within the NHS breast screening programme. J Clin Pathol. 2000;53(2):140–146. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in women aged 40-74 years who are not at increased risk for breast cancer. CMAJ. 2018;190(49):E1441–E1451. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siu AL. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(4):279–296. - PubMed

Publication types