Strengths and Limitations of a Small Randomized Trial Comparing Manual and Vacuum Drainage in Thoracentesis
- PMID: 31233478
- PMCID: PMC6592623
- DOI: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000583
Strengths and Limitations of a Small Randomized Trial Comparing Manual and Vacuum Drainage in Thoracentesis
Conflict of interest statement
Comment on
-
Safety and Tolerability of Vacuum Versus Manual Drainage During Thoracentesis: A Randomized Trial.J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2019 Jul;26(3):166-171. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000556. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2019. PMID: 30433893 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Assessing the Safety of Rare Events: The Importance of Sample Size.J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2019 Jul;26(3):e30. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000572. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2019. PMID: 31233471 No abstract available.
References
-
- Sagar SA, Bashoura L, Nasim F, et al. Assessing the safety of rare events; the importance of sample size. Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology 2018 - PubMed
-
- Ault MJ, Rosen BT, Scher J, Feinglass J, Barsuk JH. Thoracentesis outcomes: a 12-year experience. Thorax. 2015;70(2):127–132. - PubMed
-
- Jones PW, Moyers JP, Rogers JT, Rodriguez RM, Lee YC, Light RW. Ultrasound-guided thoracentesis: is it a safer method? Chest 2003. February; 123(2):418–423. - PubMed
-
- Patel PA, Ernst FR, Gunnarsson CL. Ultrasonography Guidance Reduces Complications and Costs Associated with Thoracentesis Procedure J Clin Ultrasound. 2012. Mar-Apr;40(3):135–41 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
