Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug;50(8):2002-2006.
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.024995. Epub 2019 Jun 25.

Cardiovascular Risk Scores to Predict Perioperative Stroke in Noncardiac Surgery

Affiliations

Cardiovascular Risk Scores to Predict Perioperative Stroke in Noncardiac Surgery

Tanya Wilcox et al. Stroke. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Background and Purpose- Perioperative stroke is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Conventional cardiovascular risk scores have not been compared to predict acute stroke after noncardiac surgery. Methods- Patients undergoing noncardiac surgery between 2009 and 2010 were identified from the US National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (n=540 717). Patients were prospectively followed for 30 days postoperatively for the primary outcome of stroke. Established cardiovascular and perioperative risk scores (CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, Revised Cardiac Risk Index, Mashour et al risk score, Myocardial Infarction or Cardiac Arrest risk score, and National Quality Improvement Project American College of Surgeons surgical risk calculator) were assessed to predict perioperative stroke. Results- Stroke occurred in the perioperative period of 1474 noncardiac surgeries (0.27%). Patients with perioperative stroke were older, more frequently male, had lower body mass index, and were more likely to have undergone vascular surgery or neurosurgery than patients without stroke (P<0.001 for each comparison). All risk prediction models were associated with increased risk of perioperative stroke (C statistic [AUC] range, 0.743-0.836). The Myocardial Infarction or Cardiac Arrest risk score (AUC, 0.833) and American College of Surgeons surgical risk calculator (AUC, 0.836) had the most favorable test characteristics and a greater ability to discriminate perioperative stroke when compared with Revised Cardiac Risk Index, CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and Mashour risk scores (P for comparison, <0.001; Delong). Risk scores did not provide consistent discriminative ability across surgery types and were least predictive in vascular surgery (AUC range, 0.588-0.672). Conclusions- The Myocardial Infarction or Cardiac Arrest risk score and American College of Surgeons surgical risk calculator surgical risk scores provide excellent risk discrimination for perioperative stroke in most patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Stroke prediction was less optimal in patients undergoing vascular surgery.

Keywords: forecasting; humans; male; preoperative care; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Frequency of Perioperative Stroke by Non-Cardiac Surgical Subtype
Stroke, defined as development of an embolic, thrombotic, or hemorrhagic vascular accident or stroke with motor, sensory, or cognitive dysfunction (e.g., hemiplegia, hemiparesis, aphasia, sensory deficit, impaired memory) that persists for 24 or more hours, per 100,000 surgery.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Risk Model Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves to Predict Perioperative Stroke
C-statistics, calculated using the sensitivity and specificity of each risk score for the outcome of perioperative stroke, are displayed within the figure. Risk scores between 0.5-0.7 were considered poorly discriminative, between 0.7-0.8 were considered moderately discriminative, and >0.8 were considered highly discriminative., ROC: Receiver Operating Characteristics RCRI: Revised Cardiac Risk Index MICA: Myocardial Infarction or Cardiac Arrest MASHOUR: Mashour et al. risk score for perioperative stroke ACS-SRC: American College of Surgeons Surgical Risk Calculator
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Prediction of Perioperative Stroke by Risk Model and Surgery Type. C-statistics with 95%confidence intervals are shown.
C-statistics and 95% confidence intervals are displayed by surgery type, defined by specialty of the operating surgeon. A c-statistic of greater than 0.7 (vertical line) indicates a model with acceptable accuracy in discriminating patients at risk for stroke. RCRI: Revised Cardiac Risk Index MICA: Myocardial Infarction or Cardiac Arrest MASHOUR: Mashour et al. risk score for perioperative stroke ACS-SRC: American College of Surgeons Surgical Risk Calculator

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Smilowitz NR, Gupta N, Ramakrishna H, Guo Y, Berger JS, Bangalore S. Perioperative Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events Associated With Noncardiac Surgery. JAMA cardiology. 2017;2:181–187. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fleisher LA, Fleischmann KE, Auerbach AD, Barnason SA, Beckman JA, Bozkurt B, et al. 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;130:2215–2245. - PubMed
    1. Gupta PK, Gupta H, Sundaram A, Kaushik M, Fang X, Miller WJ, et al. Development and validation of a risk calculator for prediction of cardiac risk after surgery. Circulation. 2011;124:381–387. - PubMed
    1. Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL, Zhou L, Kmiecik TE, Ko CY, et al. Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2013;217:833–842.e831-833. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peguero JG, Issa O, Podesta C, Elmahdy HM, Santana O, Lamas GA. Usefulness of the CHA2DS2VASc score to predict postoperative stroke in patients having cardiac surgery independent of atrial fibrillation. The American journal of cardiology. 2015;115:758–762. - PubMed

Publication types