Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Jun 24;19(1):83.
doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0784-4.

Comparison of vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Comparison of vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Seung Hyun Lee et al. BMC Womens Health. .

Abstract

Background: There are various surgical approaches of hysterectomy for benign indications. This study aimed to compare vaginal hysterectomy (VH) and laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) with respect to their complications and operative outcomes.

Methods: We selected randomised controlled trials that compared VH with LH for benign gynaecological indications. We included studies published after January 2000 in the following databases: Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library). The primary outcome was comparison of the complication rate. The secondary outcomes were comparisons of operating time, blood loss, intraoperative conversion, postoperative pain, length of hospital stay and duration of recuperation. We used Review Manager 5.3 software to perform the meta-analysis.

Results: Eighteen studies of 1618 patients met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed no differences in overall complications, intraoperative conversion, postoperative pain on the day of surgery and at 48 h, length of hospital stay and recuperation time between VH and LH. VH was associated with a shorter operating time and lower postoperative pain at 24 h than LH.

Conclusions: When both surgical approaches are feasible, VH should remain the surgery of choice for benign hysterectomy.

Keywords: Laparoscopic hysterectomy; Meta-analysis; Vaginal hysterectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram of the study screening and selection process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Risk of bias summary. Green circle (low risk), yellow circle (unclear), red circle (high risk)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plots of overall (a) and grade I (b) complications
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plots of grade II (a) and grade III (b) complications
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Forest plot of operating time

References

    1. Whiteman MK, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, Morrow B, Podgornik MN, Brett KM, et al. Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000–2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(1):34 e1–34 e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.039. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;8(3):CD003677.
    1. Driessen SR, Van Zwet EW, Haazebroek P, Sandberg EM, Blikkendaal MD, Twijnstra AR, et al. A dynamic quality assessment tool for laparoscopic hysterectomy to measure surgical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(6):754 e1–754 e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moen MD, Richter HE. Vaginal hysterectomy: past, present, and future. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(9):1161–1165. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2459-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Candiani M, Izzo S, Bulfoni A, Riparini J, Ronzoni S, Marconi A. Laparoscopic vs vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(4):368 e1–368 e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.09.016. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources