Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Nov:61:28-40.
doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 Apr 29.

Assessing blood loss in clinical practice

Affiliations
Review

Assessing blood loss in clinical practice

Angela Hancock et al. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Nov.

Abstract

Postpartum haemorrhage is a major global cause of mortality and morbidity amongst childbearing women. Failure or delay in recognising the severity of bleeding is an important contributory factor in these outcomes. Earlier recognition of haemorrhage would facilitate earlier intervention and treatment, helping resolve the causes of bleeding sooner, and thereby improving outcomes for women. Ways to achieve earlier recognition have traditionally focussed on the clinical skill of assessing the volume of blood loss. However, despite extensive research, the optimum method of assessing blood loss and achieving earlier diagnosis remains unclear. Examination of the psychological literature suggests that clinical decision-making is more complex and highlights some of the reasons why traditional approaches have had a limited effect. Using psychological theories of decision-making to inform solutions may lead to more successful strategies to address the issues than the current focus on volume assessment of blood loss.

Keywords: Blood loss assessment; Clinical decision-making; Diagnosis; Postpartum hemorrhage; Psychological theories; Recognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources