Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Nov;27(11):1621-1624.
doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0459-5. Epub 2019 Jun 24.

After the fact-the case of CRISPR babies

Affiliations
Review

After the fact-the case of CRISPR babies

Martin Sand et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Nov.

Abstract

The world has been startled by the irresponsible experiment of He Jiankui, who used CRISPR to genetically modify human embryos. In this viewpoint, we explore the phenomenon of moral luck in medicine and its bearing on the limits of simple judgements of the kind "everything that ends well is well" or "someone broke the rules, and is therefore blameworthy". The risks involved in scientific and medical experiments are often brushed aside, when they turn out well. The clinical application of CRISPR in the human germline is presently too risky to be used without more preclinical research and unacceptable without broader societal support, which justifies the call for a moratorium by the scientific community. However, such policies do not determine how to assess cases, where someone was willing to take such risks beyond all rules, guidelines and regulation and succeeds. The policies including the proposed moratorium are as unanimous about the undesirability of current applications of clinical germline editing as they are about the potential importance of this research. What if this potential is achieved by breaking the rules? The paradox of moral luck impinges on this debate. In our analysis, we rebut simplified judgments and advocate a more balanced view on the relation between moral responsibility and the societal consequences of medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Normile D. Shock greets claim of CRISPR-edited babies. Science. 2018;362:978–9. doi: 10.1126/science.362.6418.978. - DOI - PubMed
    1. European Society for Human Genetics. Response to “Adopt a moratorium on heritable gene editing”. European Society for Human Genetics; 2019. https://www.eshg.org/index.php?id=909. Accessed 18 Apr 2019.
    1. Lander ES, Baylis F, Zhang F, Charpentier E, Berg P, Bourgain C, et al. Adopt a moratorium on heritable genome editing. Nature. 2019;567:165–8. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-00726-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bredenoord AL, Appleby JB. Mitochondrial replacement techniques: remaining ethical challenges. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;21:301–4. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2017.08.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cyranoski D. CRISPR-baby scientist fails to satisfy critics. Nat News. 2018 doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-07573-w. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types