Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar;34(3):1301-1309.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06901-z. Epub 2019 Jun 24.

Splenic preservation versus splenectomy in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched study

Affiliations

Splenic preservation versus splenectomy in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched study

Alma L Moekotte et al. Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The laparoscopic approach in distal pancreatectomy is associated with higher rates of splenic preservation compared to open surgery. Although favorable postoperative short-term outcomes have been reported in open spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy when compared to distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy, it is unclear whether this observation applies to the laparoscopic approach. The aim of this study is to compare laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) with laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (LDPS).

Study design: This is a UK wide, propensity score-matched study, including patients who underwent LSPDP or LDPS between 2006 and 2016. Short-term outcomes were compared between LSPDP and LDPS according to intention to treat. Additionally, risk factors for unplanned splenectomy were explored.

Results: A total of 456 patients were included from eleven centers (229 LSPDP and 227 LDPS). We were able to match 173 LSPDP cases to 173 LDPS cases, according to intention to treat. No differences were seen in postoperative morbidity between the groups. The only identified risk factor for unplanned splenectomy was tumor size ≥ 30 mm.

Conclusions: Preserving the spleen during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is not associated with a lower postoperative morbidity compared to sacrificing the spleen. Tumor size is a risk factor for unplanned splenectomy.

Keywords: Benign; Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy; Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy; Low-grade malignant; Splenectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Alma L. Moekotte, Sanne Lof, Steve A. White, Ravi Marudanayagam, Bilal Al-Sarireh, Sakhanat Rahman, Zahir Soonawalla, Mark Deakin, Somaiah Aroori, Basil Ammori, Dhanny Gomez, Gabriele Marangoni, and Mohammed Abu Hilal have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flowchart. LDP Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy, LSPDP Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy, PDAC Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Warshaw AL. Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg (Chicago, Ill 1960) 1988;123:550–553. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400290032004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kimura W, Inoue T, Futakawa N, Shinkai H, Han I, Muto T. Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and vein. Surgery. 1996;120:885–890. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6060(96)80099-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shoup M, Brennan MF, McWhite K, Leung DHY, Klimstra D, Conlon KC. The value of splenic preservation with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg. 2002;137:164–168. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.2.164. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benoist S, Dugué L, Sauvanet A, Valverde A, Mauvais F, Paye F, Farges O, Belghiti J. Is there a role of preservation of the spleen in distal pancreatectomy? J Am Coll Surg. 1999;188:255–260. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00299-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cooperman AM (1978) Surgery of the pancreas: a text and atlas

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources