Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2019 Jul;26(3):199-209.
doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000552.

A Multicenter Study on the Utility of EBUS-TBNA and EUS-B-FNA in the Diagnosis of Mediastinal Lymphoma

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

A Multicenter Study on the Utility of EBUS-TBNA and EUS-B-FNA in the Diagnosis of Mediastinal Lymphoma

Sahajal Dhooria et al. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2019 Jul.

Abstract

Background: There is conflicting data on the utility of endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) for the detection and subtyping of lymphomas. Herein, we present our experience with EBUS-TBNA in suspected lymphoma.

Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective study of subjects with suspected lymphoma who underwent EBUS-TBNA (July 2011 to June 2017). The performance characteristics of EBUS-TBNA were calculated separately for suspected new-onset and recurrent lymphoma as well as for subtyping. We also analyzed the factors predicting the yield of EBUS-TBNA in suspected lymphoma.

Results: Among the 4803 EBUS procedures performed, 92 (1.9%) subjects had either suspected or proven lymphoma; 48 were finally diagnosed to have lymphoma. The diagnostic sensitivities of EBUS-TBNA in new-onset and recurrent lymphomas were 72.7% and 73.3%, respectively. Only 24.2% (8/33) subjects with new-onset lymphoma could be appropriately subtyped. This low yield was possibly due to inadequate material for cell block in 10 subjects, and performance of immunophenotyping and flow cytometry in only 5 and 1 subjects, respectively. Among the suspected cases of recurrence, EBUS-TBNA was sufficient for management in 81.8% (18/22). On a multivariate analysis, no factor (rapid onsite evaluation, needle size, number of lymph nodes sampled, passes per node, and size of the largest lymph node sampled) predicted the diagnostic yield.

Conclusion: EBUS-TBNA is a useful investigation in the diagnostic algorithm of suspected lymphoma as it helps avoid other invasive diagnostic procedures. The sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA in subtyping new-onset mediastinal lymphoma depends on the adequacy of cell aspirate and the judicious utilization of pathologic techniques.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types