Analysis of biomedical Spanish articles retracted between 1970 and 2018

Abstract

Background and objective: To analyse articles retracted due to irregularities by authors helps to determine the state of scientific integrity of a discipline or country. The Retraction Watch (RW) database is the largest worldwide database on retracted articles. The objective was to determine the reasons for and features of retracted biomedical articles by Spanish authors.

Material and methods: A search was conducted in the RW database of 7 types of scientific articles from 9 biomedicine disciplines -biology, genetics, medicine, microbiology, neurosciences, nutrition, dentistry, public health and toxicology-, with at least one author working in a Spanish centre, and published between 1970 and 2018. The features of the articles and the reasons for their retraction were recorded.

Results: Of the 18,621 retracted articles, 217 (1%) were by Spanish authors; 155 (74%) were on biomedicine and the types of articles of interest. In most cases, there were several reasons for retracting an article. Research misconduct (fabrication, falsification, plagiarism) and duplication were involved in 25% and 35% of the cases, respectively. Twenty-two percent of the articles were retracted due to errors by the authors or the journals. A dentist retracted 18 articles -all from the same journal and in the same year, 2018-, which accounts for 12% of all retracted biomedicine articles.

Conclusion: The number of retracted biomedicine articles by Spanish authors is low. Research misconduct was a frequent reason, with a similar percentage of articles retracted due to honest errors.

Keywords: Artículos retractados; Base de datos Retraction Watch; Biology; Biología; Biomedicina; Biomedicine; España; Genetics; Genética; Medicina; Medicine; Microbiology; Microbiología; Neurociencias; Neurosciences; Nutrición; Nutrition; Odontology; Odontología; Public health; Retracted articles; Retraction Watch database; Salud pública; Spain; Toxicology; Toxicología.